OCP for Transformers

Status
Not open for further replies.

beto

Member
Can anyone tell me when a primary and secondary overcurrent protection is required. From table 450.3(B)it seems that I can have only primary protection for my 75KVA 480/208V transformer like a 125A fuse and don't have secondary protection. Do you guys see this different? Can you give me a code reference that tells me I need to have secondary protection? I have an inspector that claims I should have secondary protection as well.
Thanks a lot for your help.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Re: OCP for Transformers

Even if the transformer itself doesn't require secondary protection, the secondary conductors will.
Don
 

mclain

Member
Re: OCP for Transformers

Don
If the transformer secondary conductors were considered a tap and terminated in a OCPD and complied with the requirements of a tap you wouldn't need secondary protection at the transformer would you.

Don McLain

[ January 13, 2004, 10:22 AM: Message edited by: mclain ]
 

jim dungar

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Wisconsin
Occupation
PE (Retired) - Power Systems
Re: OCP for Transformers

Secondary overcurrent protection on transformers is always optional.

Secondary lighting and branch circuit panelboards must have protection.

Secondary conductors must have protection unless a "tap rule" is applicable.

Transformer primary protection may be "upsized" (from 125%) only if secondary protection is supplied and it is limited to 125% of the secondary current.
 

earlydean

Senior Member
Re: OCP for Transformers

Jim,
What about 240.21(C)? These six opotions are not taps, and they do not require OC protection.
 

jim dungar

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Wisconsin
Occupation
PE (Retired) - Power Systems
Re: OCP for Transformers

Earl,

You are correct. I am from the old school and have always generically refered to the Article 240.21 provisions as "tap rules".
 

templdl

Senior Member
Location
Wisconsin
Re: OCP for Transformers

This is the way I interprete the application:
Art 240.21(C)(1)through (6) the secondary can be protected with a pri. OCPD per (1) Protection by Pri. OC device should the transformer have a 1ph 2w or 3ph, 3w secondary. Ref. to art 450.3 for transformer OCPD sizing.
However, 1ph,3w and 3ph,4w are more common for which art 240.4(F), Secondary conductors, apply.
Note that in either case when secondary protection is provided then it is possible to size the pri. overcurrent protective device up to 250%. The location of that primary device may be at the transformer or located up to 25' upstream from the transformer (25' tap rule), or 25' from where the sec. OCPD is located to where the pri' OCPD is located. That is if the sec. OCPD is located 10' frome the transformer than the pri. OCPD can only be 15' from the transformer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top