Old fuse panel

Status
Not open for further replies.

sfav8r

Senior Member
I just came from a call at an apartment bldg. where one of the units had lost power to all of the outlets.

It was pretty much a no-brainer because one of the fuses was blown and it was obvious that the circuit was overloaded by the numberous extension cords present.

The interesting part is that there were four fuses. I didn't think much of that at first, but then I started wondering why if there were four fuses, ONE blown fuse would take out all of the plugs. Pretty strange to have three light fuses and only one plug fuse.

What I discovered is that there is essentially two circuits, one for lights one for plugs. If EITHER of the bottom fuses is removed, all of the plugs stop operating. If EITHER of the top fuses is removed, all the lights lose power.

Why? I don't have a lot of experience with bldgs. of this vintage, but the only reason I can see for this is that the two fuese are in series to assure protection even in the event of a faulty fuse. This seems pretty unlikely and even if it was the case, why would there be a lug for each fuse instead of a common lug for the two fuses?
 

al hildenbrand

Senior Member
Location
Minnesota
Occupation
Electrical Contractor, Electrical Consultant, Electrical Engineer
Re: Old fuse panel

Heh! You're right with that one, sfav8r! The fused neutral in the common 120 volt branch circuit was a practice that didn't last long into the 20th century. I work in the inner city of Minneapolis, St. Paul, where I run into the overcurrent protection you describe about every 40th service. They are being weeded out slowly and steadily, but there will probably be a few that will never get upgraded.

The important thing, to me, is remembering this configuration as being one of a couple that can result in the loads on the circuit not working yet testing hot on both the hot and neutral.

[ April 05, 2004, 10:31 PM: Message edited by: al hildenbrand ]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top