grasfulls
Always tired, so cannot retire
- Location
- Placer County. CA
- Occupation
- Professional inane question maker
I have been "fixing" a modular lighting system and in one of the module enclosures were several 14/3 NMS cables leaving the enclosure. Pulling everything apart we found a 14/2 from one loadcenter feeding one leg going out (straight through the panel, no connection to any module output). The neutrals were also tied together with a jumper to one of the neutral bars for modules. The other feed out was fed by an output on a module, the input coming from a different load center. The loads feeding straight through are for constant power to 1/2 of duplex receptacles in rooms. The loads feeding from modules are for the switched half. We disconnected the jumpers to module neutral bars and lost power to plugs.
We checked with a volt meter and there was still power but no neutral. We opened the panels, one with breakers for house loads (P1), one with breakers for lighting modules (P2). A side point here is that the phasing of A and B is different for both panels so there is 240 vac potential from phase A to phase A and Phase B to phase B.
We found three neutrals not connected in P1. Checking voltage from disconnected neutral to the associated breaker showed 240 volts, so we knew there was back-feed from a breaker on the other phase. It turned out to be the breaker feeding the module inputs that in turn fed the switched half of the receptacles. They are on the same phase if you just go A, B, A ,B etc, that is when we noticed the inverted phasing. So, the switched half has its own breaker from P2, and the constant power its own breaker form from P1, but with the 14/3 going out to the areas, there is really only one neutral. We wanted to land all of the neutrals so we made sure everything was phased the same (no 240 from from two different panels in a box), but now we are potentially loading up the neutral. We have suggested to the owner to drop the circuit from P1 and feed all of the plugs with one breaker so as to insure no overloading the neutral.
What are your thoughts?
1) Keep one breaker from each panel but on different phases and there is now 240 under the yoke of the receptacle but a balanced neutral?
2) Put the two breakers in one panel and use a tied 2-pole breaker?
3) Abandon one breaker and feed both halves of the receptacle with one breaker?
4) Leave the panel's opposite phasing alone (should not have been an issue if wired properly)
I think I will make a little drawing because this is very weird.
thanks!
gare
We checked with a volt meter and there was still power but no neutral. We opened the panels, one with breakers for house loads (P1), one with breakers for lighting modules (P2). A side point here is that the phasing of A and B is different for both panels so there is 240 vac potential from phase A to phase A and Phase B to phase B.
We found three neutrals not connected in P1. Checking voltage from disconnected neutral to the associated breaker showed 240 volts, so we knew there was back-feed from a breaker on the other phase. It turned out to be the breaker feeding the module inputs that in turn fed the switched half of the receptacles. They are on the same phase if you just go A, B, A ,B etc, that is when we noticed the inverted phasing. So, the switched half has its own breaker from P2, and the constant power its own breaker form from P1, but with the 14/3 going out to the areas, there is really only one neutral. We wanted to land all of the neutrals so we made sure everything was phased the same (no 240 from from two different panels in a box), but now we are potentially loading up the neutral. We have suggested to the owner to drop the circuit from P1 and feed all of the plugs with one breaker so as to insure no overloading the neutral.
What are your thoughts?
1) Keep one breaker from each panel but on different phases and there is now 240 under the yoke of the receptacle but a balanced neutral?
2) Put the two breakers in one panel and use a tied 2-pole breaker?
3) Abandon one breaker and feed both halves of the receptacle with one breaker?
4) Leave the panel's opposite phasing alone (should not have been an issue if wired properly)
I think I will make a little drawing because this is very weird.
thanks!
gare