Outlet?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bennie

Esteemed Member
Does a remote panel in a detached building meet the definition of "Outlet" as described in Article 100?
 
Re: Outlet?

No. At a panel, you may take current to supply outlets further downstream, but no ?utilization equipment? is located within the panel itself.
 
Re: Outlet?

But....What if I mount a light fixture or a cooling fan directly onto the panel? I feed the two directly from a OCD within the panel. I think this installation deems the panel an outlet.

Now, the real question: If the panel is installed in a bedroom, does the entire panel need to be AFCI protected? :)
 
Re: Outlet?

Bryan: I've created another monster :D

Now for the rest of the story...If the panel meets the definition of an outlet, then the feeder, to the panel, is a branch circuit.

A grounding electrode would not be required at a detached building.
 
Re: Outlet?

Bennie,
If the panel meets the definition of an outlet, then the feeder, to the panel, is a branch circuit.
The feed to a panel that has OCPD devices in it can't be a branch circuit. All circuits on the line side of the final code required OCPD are feeders. The branch circuit originates at the load side of the last required OCPD.
Don
 
Re: Outlet?

If you run conductors to a motor starter that has fuses in it, is it a feeder or a branch circuit?

If the fuses are for protection of the starter componets are they still the final OCPD's? ;)

Anyways, Bryan, all joking aside you bring up a good point about having a panel in a bedroom.

With all the concern of the total circuit being AFCI protected in bedrooms, we could still have a much greater potential parallel or series arching hazard legally installed in a bedroom.

I have always wondered about a bedroom that would share a kitchen wall with range, dishwasher, compactor, disposal, small appliances, microwave,etc... yet be concerned with an outlet or two in the bedroom itself.

Roger
 
Re: Outlet?

Branch Circuit...The circuit conductors between the final overcurrent device protecting the circuit and the outlet(s).

If the panel is an outlet, then the feeder is a branch circuit.

I would not want to contest this decision in a court.
 
Re: Outlet?

A case can be made that the utilization equipment takes current from the panel.

To put it another way...The panel supplies current to the utilization equipment.

I can't see any way the panel does not meet the definition of an outlet.

My point in this... to call attention to the fact that a detached building panel is required to have a ground electrode. The same building, with any framing attached to main building, does not require a ground electrode.
 
Re: Outlet?

I think I see where you are coming from as I wondered why the NEC requires a GE at a detatch building.

If we go back to Light standerds and Mike holts look at installing a ground rod there, he feels that the EGC is all that is needed.

So why do we need a GE here if there is an EGC ran to the main panel that will do the same thing???
 
Re: Outlet?

I have done a bit more research, on this issue.
I now understand why a ground electrode is a good idea at the separate building. The same reason a ground rod should be driven at a light pole base.

The equipment ground conductor and the earth will be in parallel. This will reduce the impedance in the ground fault path.

[ May 09, 2003, 12:20 AM: Message edited by: bennie ]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top