what if the device hade a 54% power factor ?1500w / 120v = 12.5 amps.
what has a .54 PF without being basically unloaded? In other words, if this were an induction motor RATED for 1500W, that rating would be the full load rating, in which case the PF would be somewhere around .80, maybe better. If the PF were .54, that would only happen if the motor was unloaded, in which case it would not be pulling 1500W.what if the device hade a 54% power factor ?
Why didn't you state that in the OP?what if the device hade a 54% power factor ?
There is an ongoing confusion for some people between the Efficiency of a motor (effective output power divided by the real part of input power) and the Power Factor of that motor. Both vary with motor load, but the efficiency number (if specified) will generally refer to full load conditions.what has a .54 PF without being basically unloaded? In other words, if this were an induction motor RATED for 1500W, that rating would be the full load rating, in which case the PF would be somewhere around .80, maybe better. If the PF were .54, that would only happen if the motor was unloaded, in which case it would not be pulling 1500W.
Or conversely it is was still pulling 1500W at a .54 PF, then that means the full load rating was something higher, likely 2200W, in which case the FLC would be around 18.5A. Still OK on a 20A circuit, so long as it is not continuous.
Probably because horses were used for centuries before theoretical values and mathematical equations.Side question: We have seen a steady tendency for electrical units, and scientific units in general) to be named or renamed after a prominent scientist or inventor in the associated field. Why no proper name for horsepower? Any candidates?
Do you happen to know the standard horse he based his calculations on? Being a little facetious, but we watched some Draft horse pulls last year and those are not all created equal. Is that where the efficiency comes in to play?The term “horsepower” was first used by none other than James Watt, comparing the power of a steam engine to that of a draught horse. The SI unit “Watt” came along after his death as a way of honoring his work.
I have a name that relates to a long eared animal, similar to a horse, for a few people!Side question: We have seen a steady tendency for electrical units, and scientific units in general) to be named or renamed after a prominent scientist or inventor in the associated field. Why no proper name for horsepower? Any candidates?
... Or the ability to lift one pound 33,000 feet per minute.
33,000 FPM = 375 MPH. That would have to be one fast draught horse!
It could have been Ass Power.Probably a good thing they used horses and not cats