Dave58er
Senior Member
- Location
- Dearborn, MI
A violation of what?DaveTap said:And it could be a violation if the run is really really long 10 might not be big enough... (sorry I just couldn't resist) :grin:
A violation of what?DaveTap said:And it could be a violation if the run is really really long 10 might not be big enough... (sorry I just couldn't resist) :grin:
infinity said:I don't know. What I said was that if you wanted to use 20 amp duplex receptacles you can not use 15 amp circuits. Is that what you meant?
Dave58er said:A violation of what?![]()
tallgirl said:Voltage drop limitations.
Voltage drop is based on wire gauge and length. At 16A (80% of 20A), each percent VD at 120v is caused by 0.075 ohms resistance (R = E / I, R = 1.2 / 16, R = 0.075).
Using some common wire gauges, 1% drop is 23' of 12/2 (assuming 1.618 ohms / kilofoot) (L = 0.0750 / 1.618, L = 0.0463 kilofeet, or L = 23' out and back), 36' of 10/2 (assuming 1.018 ohms / kilofoot) and 58' of 8/2 (assuming 0.6405 ohms / kilofoot).
So, if you had a 20A BC with a 150' length and 3% VD limit, you'd have to run 8/2. 150' of 10/2 would have a total there-and-back resistance of .3054 (1.018 ohms per kilofoot times 300' total = .3054 ohms) and a VD at 16A of 4.9v (E = I * R, E = 16 * .3054, E = 4.9), or 4%. 150' of 8/2 would have a VD of 3.1v, or 2.6%.
infinity said:His point was that voltage drop is a design consideration not a code violation.
Correct....The "FPN" things aren't part of the code, they are just nice little notes?
90.5(C) Explanatory Material Explanatory material, such as references to other standards, references to related sections of this Code, or information related to a Code rule, is included in this Code in the form of fine print notes (FPNs). Fine print notes are informational only and are not enforceable as requirements of this Code.
Thanks for covering me while I was out.infinity said:His point was that voltage drop is a design consideration not a code violation.
Dave58er said:Thanks for covering me while I was out.![]()
tallgirl said:I've only had the voltage drop issue come up once because most of the time the runs aren't long enough to be an issue. In that instance the decision was to add another circuit and shorten up the run that was causing the concern.
iwire said:What was the issue?
What was the concern?
What utilization equipment in a home will 'care' if you have some voltage drop?
I wanted to, but I still don't know how to quote twice in one post.infinity said:No problem Dave. You should thank Don for posting 90.5(C).![]()
Dave58er said:I wanted to, but I still don't know how to quote twice in one post.
Sooner or later I'll have to get my kids to show me how these new computer things work.![]()
Elsie the Cow said:To err is human, to moo bovine.
And then there was the AHJ that got somewhat upset with me for pointing out that VD was an FPN. Also had to point out 90.5.tallgirl said:210.19 (A) (1) FPN 4?
The "FPN" things aren't part of the code, they are just nice little notes?
coulter said:And then there was the AHJ that got somewhat upset with me for pointing out that VD was an FPN. Also had to point out 90.5.
Later he was overheard, by a reliable source, saying, "I can enforce an FPN if I want to."
Left me with my mouth hanging open. I have no clues on how to deal with this one.
georgestolz said:Tallgirl, I just learned something here. Thank you.
Typing [noparse][/noparse] around the tags keeps them from actually doing what they're designed to do, so it can be demonstrated. That's awesome.![]()
georgestolz said:Tallgirl, I just learned something here. Thank you.