thepatriotengineer
Member
- Location
- USA
- Occupation
- PE
NEC 250.122(B): New for 2020 - If ungrounded conductors are increased in size.....wire-type equipment grounding conductors (EGC) shall be increased in size proportionally to the increase in circular mil area of the ungrounded conductors.
See calculation example in NEC Handbook.
Another example: 200A feeder, 250kcmil AL wire upsized to 900kcmil AL to compensate for voltage drop - normally the EGC would be #6CU, per NEC 250.122(A).
900000 / 250000 = 3.6; from Table 8 in Chapter 9, area of #6CU = 26240cmil, so the area of the upsized EGC = 3.6 * 26240 = 94464.
Upsized EGC = #1/0CU
Question: Suppose the distance is long enough to require a parallel 900AL feeder (2 sets), is this calculation based off the total area (1800kcmil) or the area of just one of the feeders (900kcmil)? It's a difference of #1/0CU EGC vs. #4/0CU EGC in each feeder.....and at the distances involved, that becomes very expensive quickly.
See calculation example in NEC Handbook.
Another example: 200A feeder, 250kcmil AL wire upsized to 900kcmil AL to compensate for voltage drop - normally the EGC would be #6CU, per NEC 250.122(A).
900000 / 250000 = 3.6; from Table 8 in Chapter 9, area of #6CU = 26240cmil, so the area of the upsized EGC = 3.6 * 26240 = 94464.
Upsized EGC = #1/0CU
Question: Suppose the distance is long enough to require a parallel 900AL feeder (2 sets), is this calculation based off the total area (1800kcmil) or the area of just one of the feeders (900kcmil)? It's a difference of #1/0CU EGC vs. #4/0CU EGC in each feeder.....and at the distances involved, that becomes very expensive quickly.