Padmount XFMR Vault (Box Pad) & HV/LV Seperation

Status
Not open for further replies.

yesterlectric

Senior Member
Location
PA
Occupation
Electrician
Anyone know from experience a good method for maintaining separation between high and low side conductors when installing a pad mount transformer that has primary over 1KV and secondary less than 1KV and using an open bottom box pad (with conductors stubbing through the bottom) like shown here? 300.3C2 allows the MV & LV side to occupy the same enclosure, but only at the xfmr, not at the "vault" (box pad). Article 450 has nothing on this that helps. Article 110 as rules for manholes, which this is not.

A partition to separate the MV&LV sides isn't so desirable as it impedes the service loop for the 35KV cable. A conduit stub up in the vault for the LV conductors isn't so desirable either as it can be subject to breakage, and also makes for less termination bending radius for the conductors' connection to the xfmr spades.

Utilities likely do this all the time without consideration, but NEC applies to non-utility installs, and article 300, at least as written, requires separation.

1625850123416.png
 
Anyone know from experience a good method for maintaining separation between high and low side conductors when installing a pad mount transformer that has primary over 1KV and secondary less than 1KV and using an open bottom box pad (with conductors stubbing through the bottom) like shown here? 300.3C2 allows the MV & LV side to occupy the same enclosure, but only at the xfmr, not at the "vault" (box pad). Article 450 has nothing on this that helps. Article 110 as rules for manholes, which this is not.

A partition to separate the MV&LV sides isn't so desirable as it impedes the service loop for the 35KV cable. A conduit stub up in the vault for the LV conductors isn't so desirable either as it can be subject to breakage, and also makes for less termination bending radius for the conductors' connection to the xfmr spades.

Utilities likely do this all the time without consideration, but NEC applies to non-utility installs, and article 300, at least as written, requires separation.

View attachment 2557094
I dont see that separation is required in the vault.

(2) Over 1000 Volts, Nominal. Conductors of circuits
rated over 1000 volts, nominal, shall not occupy the same
equipment wiring enclosure, cable, or raceway with conductors
of circuits rated 1000 volts, nominal, or less unless
otherwise permitted in 300.3(C)(2)(a) through (C)(2)(d).

I dont see that the the vault is an equipment wiring enclosure, a cable or, raceway.
 

yesterlectric

Senior Member
Location
PA
Occupation
Electrician
I dont see that separation is required in the vault.



I dont see that the the vault is an equipment wiring enclosure, a cable or, raceway.
Well I guess "equipment wiring enclosure" is then up for debate. It's not defined. It would seem to me that the box pad could be an equipment wiring enclosure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top