tim89s
Member
- Location
- Brush Prairie WA
Panel access
- Thread starter tim89s
- Start date
- Status
MAC702
Senior Member
- Location
- Clark County, NV
As long as it's still obvious it's an electrical panel, I don't see why not. I'm not claiming to know there's no Code against it, though.
Indeed, there's also a lock on there, even though most places don't use it, so it can't be all that important to take a few extra seconds for an authorized person to get inside.
Indeed, there's also a lock on there, even though most places don't use it, so it can't be all that important to take a few extra seconds for an authorized person to get inside.
jumper
Senior Member
- Location
- 3 Hr 2 Min from Winged Horses
technically it could be considered a violation of the working space, but lord help any inspector that tries to write it up.
- Location
- Tennessee NEC:2017
- Occupation
- Semi-Retired Electrician
Obviously you can, the pic clearly shows that!
240.24 (D)
240.24 (D)
This is going to sound ridiculous, but how is paper not considered "easily ignitable material" as part of the 240.24(D) requirement for overcurrent protection. While I agree this isn't really an issue, why even cite easily ignitable material if it's not an issue.
240.24 (D)
This is going to sound ridiculous, but how is paper not considered "easily ignitable material" as part of the 240.24(D) requirement for overcurrent protection. While I agree this isn't really an issue, why even cite easily ignitable material if it's not an issue.
jumper
Senior Member
- Location
- 3 Hr 2 Min from Winged Horses
I do not think ignitable materiel was the issue, it is a matter of access and/or working space.
I do not think any sane person person could reasonably say those papers violate either sections in any real or tangible way.
- Location
- Placerville, CA, USA
- Occupation
- Retired PV System Designer
Using a locked electrical panel as a place to hide your cigarettes, OTOH, would be a violation. :angel:
newservice
Senior Member
- Status