• We will be performing upgrades on the forums and server over the weekend. The forums may be unavailable multiple times for up to an hour each. Thank you for your patience and understanding as we work to make the forums even better.

Panelboard Main Breaker Rating < Bus Rating

dsr

Member
Location
New Mexico, United States
Occupation
EE
Hello, the first image is the panelboard quote excerpt showing the bus rating below the MCB rating. The second image is the the NEC that I'm wondering if is being violated. The bus is technically a conductor so perhaps relying on the AT acceptable? I may have incorrectly been under the assumption that the panel rating IS the bus rating. Thank you for any input.

1711648052181.png 1711648065190.png
 

David Castor

Senior Member
Location
Washington, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
As long as the 200 A trip is fixed by the trip element and requires a physical replacement to change it, it's not a violation, IMO. If it was a 250 A trip unit with the long-time pickup adjustment set to 0.9, then it would be problematic.
 

dsr

Member
Location
New Mexico, United States
Occupation
EE
The trip rating is 200 amps the bus rating is 225 amps. What are we missing?
Thank you, you're not missing anything, I just wanted others input. This is the first time I've seen the frame rating not being equal to or less than the bus rating. I wasn't sure if the code is referring to the Frame or Trip rating. I imagined a case where someone looking to add more loads would see the max trip setting of the MCB could mistakenly assume that the bus could handle 250 A. Perhaps any qualified Electrician would never do that. But again, the bus is a conductor so it also makes sense that the trip setting is all that matters.
 

dsr

Member
Location
New Mexico, United States
Occupation
EE
As long as the 200 A trip is fixed by the trip element and requires a physical replacement to change it, it's not a violation, IMO. If it was a 250 A trip unit with the long-time pickup adjustment set to 0.9, then it would be problematic.
Thank you David, I didn't realize that adjustable breakers could be fixed permanently. I always thought they could be field adjusted.
 

PD1972

Member
Location
New York (2017 NEC)
Occupation
engineer
Thank you David, I didn't realize that adjustable breakers could be fixed permanently. I always thought they could be field adjusted.
That looks like a submittal from Square D. Because it says "STD LI" I think that's a JD circuit breaker with electronic trip and adjustable LI. The long-time pickup setting dial is not fixed permanently. It is a field adjustment dial that ranges up to 250A, as noted by the "250AS".

To me, the lr trip rating is set to 200AT to satisfy your protection requirements. It is not a violation to have adjustable longtime protection. Refer to NEC 240.6(B) & (C).

Your breaker is going to look like this:
1711652638869.png
 

dsr

Member
Location
New Mexico, United States
Occupation
EE
That looks like a submittal from Square D. Because it says "STD LI" I think that's a JD circuit breaker with electronic trip and adjustable LI. The long-time pickup setting dial is not fixed permanently. It is a field adjustment dial that ranges up to 250A, as noted by the "250AS".

To me, the lr trip rating is set to 200AT to satisfy your protection requirements. It is not a violation to have adjustable longtime protection. Refer to NEC 240.6(B) & (C).

Your breaker is going to look like this:
View attachment 2570788
Thank you very much for the concise information. We'd fall into (C)(3). I appreciate everyone's input!

1711653595650.png
 
Top