plug-in air fresheners

Status
Not open for further replies.

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Re: plug-in air fresheners

Internet rumor.

Internet rumors are false, says Glade manufacturer
Statement from S.C. Johnson:

Company Response to Internet Rumor on Glade PlugIns?
SC Johnson recently learned that there have been postings on the Internet that have claimed that our products were involved in fires. It is important that you know that all of our PlugIns? products are safe and will not cause fires. We know this because PlugIns? products have been sold for more than 15 years and hundreds of millions of the products are being used safely.

Because we are committed to selling safe products, SC Johnson thoroughly investigated these rumors. First, we confirmed that no one had contacted SC Johnson to tell us about these fires or to ask us to investigate them. Additionally, we had a leading fire investigation expert call the fire department representative who is identified in one of the Internet postings. That fireman indicated that he has no evidence that our products had caused any fire.

We suspect this rumor may be associated with a past SC Johnson voluntary recall of one of its air freshener products, a Glade? Extra Outlet Scented Oil product that was sold for a short period before June 1, 2002. After discovering an assembly error in a small number of that product, SC Johnson implemented a voluntary recall and provided extensive information about the product to the U.S. Consumer Safety Commission (CPSC). After revising the manufacturing process and thorough testing for proper assembly, the Glade? PlugIns? Scented Oil Extra Outlet product returned to store shelves on June 3, 2002. SC Johnson has no knowledge of any credible reports of fire related to this product.

We also know that our products do not cause fires because all of our PlugIns? products have been thoroughly tested by Underwriters Laboratories and other independent laboratories and our products meet or exceed safety requirements. SC Johnson continues to work closely with the Consumer Product Safety Commission to investigate allegations involving PlugIns? products.

As a more than 100-year-old, family-owned company, SC Johnson is committed to providing top quality products that can be used safely in homes and we want to reassure you that PlugIns? products can be used with complete confidence.
Look at number 5 on this list

Glade

[ January 14, 2006, 09:08 AM: Message edited by: iwire ]
 

augie47

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Tennessee
Occupation
State Electrical Inspector (Retired)
Re: plug-in air fresheners

Tom, eveytime I see that ad on TV thats the first thing I think of....somewhere, sombody is going to plug an electric heater into that critter........guess the freshner would work superwell for a short while, maybe even offset some of the smoke smell :D
 

pfalcon

Senior Member
Location
Indiana
Re: plug-in air fresheners

Forget the electric heater, the site in iwire's post says we can plug hair dryers into it. Most of the dryers I've seen in use exceed the 1200 watts rated for the plug-in. Talk about scorching your hair with a dryer :roll:
 

james wuebker

Senior Member
Location
Iowa
Re: plug-in air fresheners

Well my nephew is a fire fighter and he has told me that the plug in air freshners are a fire hazard. He told me 25% of the fires today are caused by either a nite light or plug in freshners.
Bye now,
Jim
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Re: plug-in air fresheners

Originally posted by james wuebker:
Well my nephew is a fire fighter and he has told me that the plug in air freshners are a fire hazard. He told me 25% of the fires today are caused by either a nite light or plug in freshners.
Bye now,
Jim
Well as long as Jim's nephew said so it must be a fact. :D
 

james wuebker

Senior Member
Location
Iowa
Re: plug-in air fresheners

iwire, Were electrician's and I believe fire fighters know alittle more about this than we do. You must have stock in air frestners market.
Jim
 

ryan_618

Senior Member
Re: plug-in air fresheners

I have a hard time thinking that a product that is responsible for 25% of the fires in dwelings is going to be listed by UL.

Like Bob, I don't buy it.
 

james wuebker

Senior Member
Location
Iowa
Re: plug-in air fresheners

Ryan, After thinking about it I don't agree on the 25% which includes nite nights and air freshners. My point is they do cause fires.
Jim
 
B

bthielen

Guest
Re: plug-in air fresheners

So do wires, circuit breakers, light fixtures, etc. Before we go off the deep end and declare that a device is a fire hazard, we must decide to what extent, because basically just about anything can be declared a fire hazard, if we consider even the most remote possibilities. So, do these devices pose a serious increased risk?

Bob
 

haskindm

Senior Member
Location
Maryland
Re: plug-in air fresheners

Fire investigators are sometimes very quick to put blame. I saw a program once where a convenience store had burned. The fire investigators determined that it was due to "faulty wiring" and even determined the circuit that had "caused" the fire. It was only when someone reviewed the security video tape that it was learned that the last thing the clerk did before closing for the night was to empty the ash tray into the trash can! Trash caught fire and started the blaze. I was personally involved in a case where the insurance investigator determined that a fire had been caused by a "defective baseboard heater" which my company had installed. Fortunately the fire Marshall did his own investigation and determined that the fire was caused by the homeowner installing paneling using 10-penny nails that had pierced the wiring in several locations. Since then, I am very sceptical of reports of electrical fires. It seems that unless there is a gas can and book of matches discovered on the scene, all fires are electrical. There is usually no explanation as to what caused the electrical fire; poor installation, defective materials, homeowner modification, misuse, or whatever else. It is usually assumed by the public that some electrician messed up.
 

augie47

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Tennessee
Occupation
State Electrical Inspector (Retired)
Re: plug-in air fresheners

I believe thats the same situation in most areas.
We've had electrical fires on houses with no service drop :)
One fire investigator made the statement "since we found no other cause of the fire, it must have been electrical"
 

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Semi-Retired Electrical Engineer
Re: plug-in air fresheners

From the works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle:
Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.
The problem here is that the investigators did not do a good enough job of eliminating the impossible.
 

realolman

Senior Member
Re: plug-in air fresheners

Originally posted by haskindm:


... the fire Marshall did his own investigation and determined that the fire was caused by the homeowner installing paneling using 10-penny nails that had pierced the wiring in several locations.
I wonder how some one who installs paneling w 10 penny nails gets to be a homeowner :confused:
 

apauling

Senior Member
Re: plug-in air fresheners

i agree with hask. I think they are just making it look like they are working. i doubt that there is any real effort except to find someone to blame. I would assume a suspicious death might get very serious, but even then, the mere presence of an accelerant seems to indicate arson.

I always have a hard time accepting the authoritative approach to multiple possibilities, The Authority (fire, police, paid experts, etc) usually has a job to protect, a political agenda, and ties to someone who has something to gain from the decision.

I have never met anyone with their finger in the pie with any objectivity.

Finding someone who can actually be objective, will be objective, has the knowledge to be authoritative, is willing to use that knowledge, has access to all the info, and is the unaltered explainer of the cause, creates quite a few areas for something to go wrong with the fingerpointing.

i will maintain a peacefull but dubious outlook upon the claims to insider info, authority, and even to superior reasoning when it pertains to causes and consequences, especially relating to disasters.

paul :cool:
 

jimwalker

Senior Member
Location
TAMPA FLORIDA
Re: plug-in air fresheners

"He told me 25% of the fires today are caused by either a nite light or plug in freshners.
Bye now,"
Just think if we outlaw these 2 items our insurance will drop to 75%.Irather dought that
25 % of all the homes even have 1 of them plug in night lights or air freshners.But then when we can call it electrical fire without even haveing service then why not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top