pool bonding / grounding

Status
Not open for further replies.

stjohnbarleycorn

Senior Member
I am trying to an understanding on this. I have downloaded the available pdf from this site.
The pool area is all bonded by #8 copper, the grid the pump, lights rebar, anything metal. So you have an island of #8 connecting everything together. Then you come from the light or the pump with #12 to the panel. If I understand it right. With the wet niche I am bringing a #8 to the deck box, and also the outside bonding to the grid, but from there I am bringing a #12 back to the panel. I see that the #8 is bonding and the #12 is the GEC. .

Is it that we use the #8 because of its thickness and so less likely to be cut or broken or is it that we want a very low impedance?


I see the idea of bonding and having the area with no difference of potential, that all makes sense to me, but why not go back to the panel with the #8? It just seems the natural thing to do.

Would this cause some kind of alternate path for a short, from the light or pump, if for some reason the #8 became cut? Is it a bad idea to bring the #8 to the panel, or redundant and a waste of copper? thanks for any ideas on this.
 
stjohnbarleycorn said:
I see the idea of bonding and having the area with no difference of potential, that all makes sense to me, but why not go back to the panel with the #8? It just seems the natural thing to do.



There is just no reason to go back to the panel, Your BONDING metal objects together. thats it...
 
stickboy1375 said:
There is just no reason to go back to the panel, Your BONDING metal objects together. thats it...

I agree. You're not trying to clear a fault with a reduced size conductor, you're simply bonding together metal parts so as to lessen any potential voltages.
 
Yup, you're just bonding everything together to keep away any differences in potential between any two objects. Also the #12 would be an EGC not a GEC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top