Pool Panel Questions

Status
Not open for further replies.

jstjohnz

Member
Comments welcome.

My neighbor recently asked my help because he couldn't figure out how to turn off the power to his pool sub-panel. The pool panel itself has no main breaker. Turns out he was right, there is no way to turn it off because this panel is wired directly to the meter base on the house! My first thought was "crazy to do it that way", but after digging here on the forum it seems like it may have originally been OK as far as code....

There are actually 4 panels wired to the meter base, 2 200A panels inside the house, the pool panel, and a small 2-breaker panel on the outside wall of the house.

The pool panel originally contained 6 breakers, so I assume that per the "6 throw" rule a main breaker wasn't needed. Somewhere long the line more breakers were added so now it's not in compliance. Still seems insane to me that it would be setup that way, basically having a panel with no OCP on the conductors feeding it, so no way to safely work in that panel.

In my research here I came across the requirement that pool panel EGCs be insulated. His isn't, but it seems like even that may be OK because if I'm understanding it right the wires feeding this panel would be considered to be SE and not feeders because there is no upstream OCPD.

That got me looking at my own setup. I have a separate pool house/garage structure that was originally just a small pool house with 2 circuits going to it, 240V for the pool pump and 120V for receptacles and lighting. Isn't that a violation of the "1 circuit to a structure" rule? At some point the pool house was expanded by adding garage space and a sub-panel was installed in the pool house. Now everything is fed from that sub-panel, but the EGC to that sub-panel is not insulated. There was an electrical inspection when the last part of the garage was built but I don't know if the inspector even looked at this panel.

I have read so many posts here re pool panel feeders and I still don't understand the rules/exceptions/errata, etc. And if my setup isn't right (re insulated ground), how can it be made right? To run a new feeder to the pool house panel would require going through some concrete. Would installing a transformer be an option, to create a SDS?

It just seems crazy to me that me neighbor's setup, bizarre as it is, might be better than my own.

Sorry, long and a lot of questions....
 
As far as his install... before he exceeded the 6 breaker rule, was his panel marked "Suitable for use as Service Equipment" with the 6 allowable breaker notation.
Interesting how the difference between a feeder supply and a service supply can change things.
Amazing how the electrons know the difference :D

Could your install meet the requirements of the Exception to 680.25(A) or 680.25(B)(2) ?
 
Depending on how long ago it was installed - that "pool panel" at a separate structure could possibly have been compliant with a three conductor feeder, and the neutral boned to the panel and separate EGC's from that point out to loads. Would have been compliant as general rules apply - all depends on if anything in art 680 would have otherwise required an EGC in the feeder in that situation.
 
As far as his install... before he exceeded the 6 breaker rule, was his panel marked "Suitable for use as Service Equipment" with the 6 allowable breaker notation.
Interesting how the difference between a feeder supply and a service supply can change things.
Amazing how the electrons know the difference :D

Could your install meet the requirements of the Exception to 680.25(A) or 680.25(B)(2) ?

I didn't look for a rating on that panel. As far as the exceptions, I don't know.
 
Depending on how long ago it was installed - that "pool panel" at a separate structure could possibly have been compliant with a three conductor feeder, and the neutral boned to the panel and separate EGC's from that point out to loads. Would have been compliant as general rules apply - all depends on if anything in art 680 would have otherwise required an EGC in the feeder in that situation.

I've probably confused this by talking about 2 separate installations. The neighbor's panel is the one with the 3-wire feed direct to the meter base, and has the neutral bonded at the pool panel.

My own panel has a 4-wire feeder, neutral not bonded to the panel, but EGC is not insulated.

One other question to add to the mix. Electric pool covers are common here, and they all use a plug-connected motor to a receptacle in the pool cover compartment. On all of these installs that I have seen the pool cover motor receptacle is well within 5 feet of the pool edge. I found this code reference;

680.27 Specialized Equipment.

(B) Electrically Operated Covers.
(1) Motors and Controllers. The electric motors, controllers and wiring for an electrically operated cover shall be located at least 5 ft from the inside wall of the pool, outdoor spa or hot tub, unless separated by a permanent barrier.

What constitutes a "permanent barrier"?
 
Last edited:
I've probably confused this by talking about 2 separate installations. The neighbor's panel is the one with the 3-wire feed direct to the meter base, and has the neutral bonded at the pool panel.

My own panel has a 4-wire feeder, neutral not bonded to the panel, but EGC is not insulated.

One other question to add to the mix. Electric pool covers are common here, and they all use a plug-connected motor to a receptacle in the pool cover compartment. On all of these installs that I have seen the pool cover motor receptacle is well within 5 feet of the pool edge. I found this code reference;

680.27 Specialized Equipment.

(B) Electrically Operated Covers.
(1) Motors and Controllers. The electric motors, controllers and wiring for an electrically operated cover shall be located at least 5 ft from the inside wall of the pool, outdoor spa or hot tub, unless separated by a permanent barrier.

What constitutes a "permanent barrier"?
A wall, fence, other obstruction that is not easily movable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top