Starting an older (20 years young) pool rewire. Owner says the original wiring to the wet niche was at line voltage and he converted to 12 volt transformer type.
PVC sch. 40 is ran from the forming shell to the tranformer enclosure...not to a pool listed junction box then to the transformer. The #8 insulated bonding wire is present.....though the potting compound is not applied in the forming shell. He drilled the transformer enclosure and fastened the #8.
Though the transformer (7 feet from pool wall) is listed as suitable for supplying a wet niche.... my understanding is it is not suitable for connection to the pvc going to the wet niche... the conduit must be connected to a listed swimming pool junction box and the luminaire cord and bonding #8 terminated there before landing on any transformer.
Owner is not happy about the cost to fix this tranformer deal and disputes the reasoning for a junction box $$$...
Am I all "wet" in this or is the jb required? I say it is...
Added question...Is there a problem with the low voltage luminaire not being matched with the forming shell? I'm thinking this may pose some more issues...
Stubbie
PVC sch. 40 is ran from the forming shell to the tranformer enclosure...not to a pool listed junction box then to the transformer. The #8 insulated bonding wire is present.....though the potting compound is not applied in the forming shell. He drilled the transformer enclosure and fastened the #8.
Though the transformer (7 feet from pool wall) is listed as suitable for supplying a wet niche.... my understanding is it is not suitable for connection to the pvc going to the wet niche... the conduit must be connected to a listed swimming pool junction box and the luminaire cord and bonding #8 terminated there before landing on any transformer.
Owner is not happy about the cost to fix this tranformer deal and disputes the reasoning for a junction box $$$...
Am I all "wet" in this or is the jb required? I say it is...
Added question...Is there a problem with the low voltage luminaire not being matched with the forming shell? I'm thinking this may pose some more issues...
Stubbie