power in the top?

Status
Not open for further replies.

megloff11x

Senior Member
It seems to be a tradition that power entry is on top when you come into an enclosure, be it panel or machine. Is there a rule or is it just force of habit?
 
Re: power in the top?

Well, its a lot easier to get the wiring to the line side of the disconnect switch since it is traditionally located towards the top of the cabinet.

I have seen a fair number of specs however that require bottom entry, supposedly this reduces water infiltration in outdoor or hosedown areas.

<added> It also matters where your conduits are run. If they are overhead its a lot easier to bring them in the top. if they are under the floor its easier to come in the bottom.

[ February 09, 2005, 12:17 PM: Message edited by: petersonra ]
 
Re: power in the top?

Check Article 380 Switches. You will see that in general knife switch require the blades to be de-energized when the switch is in the open position, circuit breakers used as switches require the load lugs to be de-energized when in the open position. I especially like fuse clips de-energized when I need to replace a fuse.
 
Re: power in the top?

Circuit breakers are not required to have "identified" line and load lugs. Unless there is a specific lable that says "load end" breakers may be fed in either direction.
 
Re: power in the top?

Mr. Dungar
I agree with your statement but think it wise to add that in the 2002 code;
408.16 (F) Back-Fed Devices. Plug-in-type overcurrent protection devices or plug-in type-main lug assemblies that are backfed and used to terminate field-installed ungrounded supply conductors shall be secured in place by an additional fastener that requires other than a pull to release the device from the mounting means on the panel.
 
Re: power in the top?

With respect to circuit breakers 380-6(c) just a portion of this article " Single-throw knife switches, molded case switches, switches with butt contacts, and CIRCUIT BREAKERS used as switches shall be connected so that the terminals supplying the load are de-energized when the switch is in the open position." So while we know the breakers are generally not required to have line-load identification there are requirements as to the use of the line and load terminals.
 
Re: power in the top?

Originally posted by grant:
So while we know the breakers are generally not required to have line-load identification there are requirements as to the use of the line and load terminals.
Grant I do not know what you mean

Only if breakers are marked line and load is there an issue.

1999 NEC
380-6(c) Connection of Switches. Single-throw knife switches and switches with butt contacts shall be connected so that the blades are de-energized when the switch is in the open position. Single-throw knife switches, molded-case switches, switches with butt contacts, and circuit breakers used as switches shall be connected so that the terminals supplying the load are de-energized when the switch is in the open position.
How would it be possible to wire a circuit breaker in a way that the "terminals supplying the load" would still be live with the breaker open?

That would take some fancy wiring. ;)

Note that this section is not talking about terminals marked load, only terminals supplying a load.

Whichever end of the breaker I connect the load to becomes the terminals supplying the load.

I believe that section is redundant to 240-8. Fuses or Circuit Breakers in Parallel, as the only way I can think to have toe load side terminals remain live with the breaker open is to have a second OCPD in parallel with the first.
 
Re: power in the top?

Bob, we are in total agreement. I guess my point was the breaker is not marked line-load but as in the code article what we would call the load side (either side that goes to the load) must be de-energized when the breaker is in the open position. Once the wire is connected the line and load are determined by use and the load side has a requirement that it be de-energized when the cb is open.

[ February 09, 2005, 06:50 PM: Message edited by: grant ]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top