Nebul0us
New User
- Location
- Kennewick, WA
- Occupation
- Controls Engineer
Hey all,
I believe the company I am working for is not meeting UL508a requirements when it comes to protection on our Powerflex 525 drives. NEC states we basically have to follow the manufacturers recommendations in the manual. The manual on the PF525 drives states...
"UL – Only inverse time circuit breakers and the specified 140M/140MT
self-protected combination motor controllers are acceptable for UL
installations." (Page 22 in 520-um001_-en-e)
However, my company is currently using 1489-M circuit breakers on the line side of each PF525. This does not meet UL spec, am I wrong? Or are these considered an inverse time circuit breaker making it unnecessary to use a 140M/MT? Thanks in advance for any assistance...
I believe the company I am working for is not meeting UL508a requirements when it comes to protection on our Powerflex 525 drives. NEC states we basically have to follow the manufacturers recommendations in the manual. The manual on the PF525 drives states...
"UL – Only inverse time circuit breakers and the specified 140M/140MT
self-protected combination motor controllers are acceptable for UL
installations." (Page 22 in 520-um001_-en-e)
However, my company is currently using 1489-M circuit breakers on the line side of each PF525. This does not meet UL spec, am I wrong? Or are these considered an inverse time circuit breaker making it unnecessary to use a 140M/MT? Thanks in advance for any assistance...