tallgirl
Senior Member
- Location
- Glendale, WI
- Occupation
- Controls Systems firmware engineer
Can anyone tell me what's wrong with this picture?
tallgirl said:Can anyone tell me what's wrong with this picture?
iwire said:Yes.......it's not already in the trash.
Perhaps a better question would be 'Whats right with this panel?'
georgestolz said:I don't know what's wrong with the panel (besides age and abuse), but I do know what's wrong the picture - you shouldn't have knocked Joe Tedesco's tripod over to beat him to the shot.
tallgirl said:Can anyone tell me what's wrong with this picture?
The code does not require 2 pole breakers for a 240 volt load, but it does require handle ties. 240.20(B)(2).Are the white wires on breakers feeding 220V for something? Should be 2P breakers even if new panel.
dlhoule said:Are the white wires on breakers feeding 220V for something? Should be 2P breakers even if new panel.
tallgirl said:Al,
I couldn't understand what it was either at first because it's a very dense, very uniform rock-like substance. I was also surprised by the paint being in that condition. The water in that area was, I think, brackish as it came from both the Gulf and the Lake, neither of which are freshwater. The copper is corroded to some degree on all the wiring, but to a much greater degree on whatever was carrying a load when the levee broke -- that different kind of corrosion, or else burn marks, is how we can tell what was running when Katrina made a mess of things.
What was most interesting, to me, about that panel is that all the work in the house looked very professional. Meaning, it didn't look like someone went in there and wired up their own central air. And yet, there was a lot wrong with it that Katrina didn't cause. What we normally do is remove and replace whatever was there, rehabilitating the parts that need rehabilitating, replacing whatever can't be fixed, and working around whatever is broken and in the way.
For example, I invented a process that I used on one of the buildings I rewired that allowed us to preserve the conduit that was below the flood line (and when I say "invent" I mean "please don't ask me to explain it to you until after I submit preliminaries to the USPTO and can explain it with the words "patent pending" after it ...). That way we were able to chase down all the circuits that had been in that conduit, pull it out, and put several miles of THHN back in. But one piece of conduit had been clogged (we later determined it had been intentionally filled with cement during an earlier remodelling job ...), so we had to run conduit up and over, etc. to connect where things used to start to where they used to wind up.
But in the case of this house it was just WRONG and the people who'd worked on it -- this is the house the Navy electricians had spent time messing up -- before I got around to it hadn't made things better.
joe tedesco said:With your permission, and with that same permission from the Mike Holt eyes and ears here, I will include this image, and others sent to me, in my column in the same EC&M publication that Mike and I write for, tallgil ~ that's a nice name, but I need more, or we can do anonymous too. I think that the sad part about the picture is that is was the result of a catastrophe, and I shall recognize it as such, but with the eyes of the eagles here, and maybe from mine too we can send a message.