- Location
- Logan, Utah
I don't know that it is a violation. I've had underground service changes where the POCO wanted 3" PVC for their wiring, and the panel only came with a bottom hub opening. I installed as in the picture (at least from what I can see). It passed inspection (though I did install an insulated sleeve on the conductors)
If you look close at the picture you will notice that the front edge of the KO covers over a portion of the hub opening leaving a sharp metal edge. The overlap was about 3/4" to 1".
The POCO in my area requires a 3" minimum service lateral conduit so hubs of this type are very common.
The problem with this install was the orientation of the hub. If the hub had been installed 180 around then the hub and the knock out opening would have been aligned correctly.
Chris
Chris interesting,
Why not use a TA with bushing of course and sched 80 for a lateral and to heck with that mess. Just my thoughts....but then again hind sight is a wonderful thing. I was trying to cite conductors and protection from abrasion previously.![]()
The insulated sleeve takes care of that problem.
300.5(G) is a good section to cite for this violation.
This install had a metal riser comming up from underground so the hub is cheaper than using a grounding bushing.
Chris
Yep Bond bushings can be costly. Would we consider the lateral metallic raceway as needing to be bonded as in 250.92? or am I out in left field? That is not by definition a service. That is Lateral and POCO stuff. just a question.
looks like a field modification for sure :smile:,... what's with those screws ?? no nuts ? Did they tap the enclosure
The one I install![]()
The service lateral riser is part of the service and is supplied and installed by the electrical contractor, so IMHO it needs to be bonded in accordance with 250.92.
Chris
Cool, are you going to come up here to the frigid northern part of Utah to install it?![]()
Chris