Proximity of Aboveground Fuel Tank to a Radio Tower

Status
Not open for further replies.

jbt260

Member
Location
Ohio
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
Does anyone know if there is a Code-defined minimum distance between an approved above ground fuel storage tank and radio tower? If so, which Code?

My main concern is a lightning strike to the tower.

Thank You
Jeff
 

petersonra

Senior Member
Location
Northern illinois
Occupation
engineer
jbt260 said:
Does anyone know if there is a Code-defined minimum distance between an approved above ground fuel storage tank and radio tower? If so, which Code?

My main concern is a lightning strike to the tower.

Thank You
Jeff
one might be inclined to think that the proximity of a radio tower to a fuel storage tank would lessen the chances of the fuel tank being hit.
 
L

Lxnxjxhx

Guest
Grounded or ungrounded the current should stay in the metal of the tank.
 

petersonra

Senior Member
Location
Northern illinois
Occupation
engineer
jbt260 said:
There will be two tanks, gas and diesel.

Again I ask, does the proximity to the tower increase or decrease the danger to the tanks. IMO, having what amounts to a lightning rod above the tanks decreases the already minimal chances of the tank being hit by lightning in the first place. I don't think what is in the tanks affects its chance of getting hit.
 
Last edited:

jbt260

Member
Location
Ohio
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
I was more concerned with lightning hitting the tower and "jumping" to the fuel tanks. I do not know how well the tower is grounded. I do know that the tanks will be grounded per NFPA 780. In general, within 10' of an above ground tank is classified as a hazardous location (NEC 515).
 

petersonra

Senior Member
Location
Northern illinois
Occupation
engineer
jbt260 said:
I was more concerned with lightning hitting the tower and "jumping" to the fuel tanks. I do not know how well the tower is grounded. I do know that the tanks will be grounded per NFPA 780. In general, within 10' of an above ground tank is classified as a hazardous location (NEC 515).

what is the purpose of this tank in the first place that makes you think it is subject to article 515?
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
jbt,
NFPA 780 spells out the required bonding of conductive objects close to other conductive objects that are part of or bonded to the lightning protection system. This required bonding will prevent the "side flashes" that you are concerned with.
 

dereckbc

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Plano, TX
jbt260 said:
I was more concerned with lightning hitting the tower and "jumping" to the fuel tanks. I do not know how well the tower is grounded. I do know that the tanks will be grounded per NFPA 780. In general, within 10' of an above ground tank is classified as a hazardous location (NEC 515).

I work and design cell tower sites with LP gnesets and it is not posible for a flashover if the LP tank is bonded to the to the GES. Even if it did, there is no problem unless there is a leak in which case lightning is the least of your worries.

To my knowlege there is no minimum space requirement. As practicality goes you want the tank as close to the entrance gate as possible so the fuel trucks can reach the tank.
 

jbt260

Member
Location
Ohio
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
Thanks to everyone for your replies. I will make sure the tower and the tanks are properly grounded to a common GES.

Jeff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top