Question on article 440.22 (a)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Davidson Electrical

Principle @ Davidson Electrical Services LLC
Location
Tyler, TX
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
440.22 (a) gives me the impression that we aren't supposed to use 225% to size the overcurrent protection device unless 175% is not sufficient for the starting current. However, in Mike holts 2014 electrical exam prep book all of the protection sizing calculation examples for motor compressors use 225%.. so what am I missing?? I know I can use the nameplate most of the time and I Probably won't see this on my upcoming test but I would really like to know thanks!!
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
Welcome. :thumbsup:

If the question asks for the maximum overcurrent protection rating, using 225% is correct.
 

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
Smart-- go to sleep---:lol:

Seriously, when a question came up a long time ago you stated we should always use the rule not the exception when answering a question. Is this not the same?
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
Smart-- go to sleep---:lol:

Seriously, when a question came up a long time ago you stated we should always use the rule not the exception when answering a question. Is this not the same?
:sleep:
:sleep:
:sleep:
:huh:

In this case, 225% isn't written as an exception to that section. It is actually stated right in the section. Test question authors will likely consider that fair game. :D
 

Davidson Electrical

Principle @ Davidson Electrical Services LLC
Location
Tyler, TX
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
Found it

Found it

Found some other calculations in the same book using 1.75 and 2.25 if that doesn't work.. so guess that is right. Those examples just confused me..
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
Poor question as worded I would say. Without "maximum" being in the wording anything under 226% is an acceptable level code wise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top