kbsparky
Senior Member
- Location
- Delmarva, USA
I have just been informed that a project we are about to quote is supposedly a "scale" job.
This job is for the state, and state-funded, so I am not surprised this is part of the contract.
I just got the job-wage list, and the classification of "laborer" has been eliminated. I believe that they want everyone on the job to be classified as their respective trade -- that is someone who is handling electrical conduit is an "electrician" as well as someone excavating a trench for those conduits, etc.
Apparently using "laborers" on such projects have been misused in the past so the classification is no longer available.
Anyone else had this happen on scale jobs?
BTW, "Electrician" is the 2nd highest wage on the list: $54.05/hr. A "laborer" would only be making $34.60. Quite a difference. A further comparison shows plumbers to be worth less than a laborer at $33.25.
Someone running the bulldozer is only worth $25.10
__________________
-KB
This job is for the state, and state-funded, so I am not surprised this is part of the contract.
I just got the job-wage list, and the classification of "laborer" has been eliminated. I believe that they want everyone on the job to be classified as their respective trade -- that is someone who is handling electrical conduit is an "electrician" as well as someone excavating a trench for those conduits, etc.
Apparently using "laborers" on such projects have been misused in the past so the classification is no longer available.
Anyone else had this happen on scale jobs?
BTW, "Electrician" is the 2nd highest wage on the list: $54.05/hr. A "laborer" would only be making $34.60. Quite a difference. A further comparison shows plumbers to be worth less than a laborer at $33.25.
Someone running the bulldozer is only worth $25.10
__________________
-KB