I think that's what I said, I was just a little more concise.
Roger
IMO, re-identifying these conductors is unnecessary in the first place.
Roger
480sparky I was going to say something to that effect, glad you did.:smile:
............(D) a person that should not have their paws in these boxes in the first place.
IMO there is no reason for the requirement. :wink:
Roger
IMO, re-identifying these conductors is unnecessary in the first place.
Roger
I'm already practicing my "Would you like fries with that?".:smile:The day they take 90.1(C) and the phrase 'Qualified Person' out, I'm leaving the trade and getting a job at Micky D's.
I agree. If you don't know that the white wire connected to a single pole switch is a hot conductor how is a piece of tape going to make you instantly realize what it is?
Well, it might just be a breaker test station.I agree. If you don't know that the white wire connected to a single pole switch is a hot conductor how is a piece of tape going to make you instantly realize what it is?
......... Maybe he does something silly like disconnect everything and then forgets's that one of the whites was a hot and not a neutral.........
That's what is known as an "unqualified person".![]()
Then I would consider an electrician that's in a hurry an "unqualified person".:smile: