takelly said:
If I request that my boss fight this it would have to be more clear cut and with an inspector who was pushing his AHJ in our faces.
I'd like to know how he can justify:
1) - using the commentary as some sort of code?
The handbook explictily states:
The commentary and supplementary materials, therefore, solely reflect the personal opinions of the editor or other contributors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the NFPA or its technical committees.
2) Applying the commentary from 210.8(A)(7) to 210.8(A)(6)?
Why not just call it a day and apply 210.8(B)(2)?
I don't know how much more clear cut that can be.
takelly said:
I feel that he is just trying to best job he can with the information that he has. He was really nice to us and took the time to show us the Code when we questioned him.
I'm sorry, but the inspector is taking whatever unenforceable commentary he wants and is ad-libbing it to wherever he wants in the NEC.
This is not "trying to best job he can with the information that he has". He has the information, but he is using it incorrectly.
This might be a minor monetary issue - this time....so next time he tells you that the 2/0 CU you just installed is not rated for the 200A service[T310.15(B)(6)] and you must use 3/0 [T310.16]
takelly said:
This could go either way if I push it. The Handbook would must likely be used by his boss to support his person in the feild.
If it goes any way - but the right way...Something is rotten in the state of South Dakota. (to paraphrase Marcellus/Shakespear).
If his boss were to use the unenforceable commentary following 210.8(A)(7) and attempt to apply it to 210.8(A)(6), he would be just as wrong as the inspector....and when that happens.....
If you don't push it - it can go only one-way....and that could cost your boss some serious money on the next "misinterpretation".
I would simply approach the inspector, tell him what I have discovered/concluded/researched:
- 210.8(A)(6) is not the same as 210.8(A)(7)
- the commentary is from 210.8(A)(7), and does not apply to 210.8(A)(6).
- the handbook commentary is editorial opinion, not the official position of the NFPA and is just as unenforceable as the FPN's in the NEC( 90.5(C) ).
takelly said:
Thank you all for your time.
It is late good night
You're welcome
Good night to you, also.