NiCads are an obsolete technology. best to just get rid of them and move on IMO.
Although I would not necessarily design new equipment using NiCads, I think that they still have a place, among other things their ability to tolerate an indefinite duration controlled current overcharge. NiMH gives a higher power density, but requires a more sophisticated charger. Lithium has a very high power density, but as a result has more as well as more violent failure modes and need careful handling during charging and when used in series strings.
That said, I would just let a dysfunctional NiCad go, unless it is a large cell or battery for specific equipment.
Although I would not necessarily design new equipment using NiCads, I think that they still have a place, among other things their ability to tolerate an indefinite duration controlled current overcharge. NiMH gives a higher power density, but requires a more sophisticated charger. Lithium has a very high power density, but as a result has more as well as more violent failure modes and need careful handling during charging and when used in series strings.
That said, I would just let a dysfunctional NiCad go, unless it is a large cell or battery for specific equipment.
Well, the first part of your challenge is to determine why or in what way the cell is not performing.If the batteries were making money for me, I would do just that, but I am a tinkerer and frugal at that. It is a bit of a challenge to make something work again.