residential ground conductor

Status
Not open for further replies.

shelco

Senior Member
200 amp resi service no copper water pipe.

#6 ground wire used for grounding electrode conductor. Per table 250.66 this should be a # 4 cu but sec 250.66A states that is not necessary to be larger than #6 cu.
Which is the correct application?
 

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
Re: residential ground conductor

It depends on the grounding electrode. If there is a concrete encased electrode available then #4 would be required to be installed to the footing rebar. If it wasn't available then #6 would be the largest size grounding electrode conductor required for the two ground rods.
 

physis

Senior Member
Re: residential ground conductor

250.66 says "except as permitted in 250.66(A) through (C)."

It can be smaller if permitted by 250.66(A) through (C).
 

BruceH

Senior Member
Re: residential ground conductor

I would like to add that the last 200 amp service I did, the inspector required #4 to both ground rods. We all know that the nec requires #6 minimum to a ground rod. When I questioned this and stated code article, his reply was "#4 is standard for a 200a service around here." So, I used #4.
 

tom baker

First Chief Moderator
Staff member
Re: residential ground conductor

nec requires #6 minimum
The maximum required for a rod electrode is 6 AWG.
But 6 has to be protected against physcial damage, 4 is considered protected against severe physcial damage.
 

charlie

Senior Member
Location
Indianapolis
Re: residential ground conductor

#4 is standard for a 200a service around here.
He needs to be challenged. Unless there is a local amendment (this would be in writing and part of your law), #6 is the maximum that is required, even if the service were a 4,000 ampere at 480 volts. :D
 

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Retired Electrical Engineer
Re: residential ground conductor

Originally posted by tom baker:
But 6 has to be protected against physical damage, 4 is considered protected against severe physical damage.
In that case, is there a cost advantage of one over the other? Just curious.
 

shelco

Senior Member
Re: residential ground conductor

I used # 6 and the inspector insisted on #4 even when I point out the article stating #6 was acceptable. He wouldn't hear of it so I had to change to #4. I would like to go after him for the cost diff but I have to work in his area so it was cheap insurance.
 

ryan_618

Senior Member
Re: residential ground conductor

Go over his head. So what if you have to work with the guy? If you show him that you will only correct code violations, maybe he will only write up code violations. With this in mind, you have nothing to fear if you install to the minimum code. :)
 

BruceH

Senior Member
Re: residential ground conductor

Sorry, I choose my battles. Going over an inspectors head in a small town is almost career suicide. #4 is just as easy to carry on the truck. I've learned over the years, sometimes the hard way.
 

hurk27

Senior Member
Re: residential ground conductor

Once you show them the math that at 120 volts a 25 ohm rod electrode can only pass 4.8 amps of current.

And at higher voltages the fuse on the primary side of the transformer is rarly over 15 amps, so it would most defently handle it.

As for lightning, the event is so fast that the conductor dose not have enough time to heat up, even though many thousands of amps have past through it.

So other than the physcial protection issue why would it ever be needed to be more than a #6?
 
Re: residential ground conductor

You got me, maybe the physical protection is their reasoning. This utiltiy also requires the GEC to come out of the panel, hit the rods, and go back into the panel. I've never come across that requirement in any of the other jurisdictions I've worked in.
 

mc5w

Senior Member
Re: residential ground conductor

electrofelon,

Do you happen to work in New York State? They require an unbroken loop of #4 solid copper wire from the service ground bus, loop unbroken through both ground rods, then run back to the ground bus. The reason why I use the term ground bus is that in some service switches you use neutral and equipment ground buses joined by a wire.

NEC specifies a maximum of #6 for A ground rod. It does not say anything about 2 or more ground rods. Also, some soils have quite a bit of permanent moisture near the surface. Slightly swampy land is a great place for a substation or transmission yard.

Also, the Empire of Akron, Ohio requires a minimum of #4 solid or #2 stranded copper for a GEC. They do not want to be making judgments about the level of mechanical damage.
 

john m. caloggero

Senior Member
Re: residential ground conductor

The size of the grounding electrode conductor is based on the size of the conductors that will supply the fault current, not the rating of the service disconnecting means. If you use Table 310.15(B)(6), a 200 ampere service can be supplied by 2/0 cu, therefore, the GEC is based on Table 250.66 and for metal water pipe or building steel grounding electrode, it can be No. 4 Cu. If it is a ground rod(s), regardless of the size of the supply conductors, the GEC is not required to be larger than No. 6 Cu. If the supply conductors are No. 2 or smaller, the EGC for a ground rod(s) can be as small as No. 8 cu. according to 250.66(A).
 
Re: residential ground conductor

mc5w,

Yes the utility I was refering to is in NY. Thats interesting, so the unbroken loop requirement is a state mandate? Always thought it was just NYSEG's requirement. New York state is interesting: no state level licensing, no afi requirement, GEC loop-back......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top