David S.
Member
- Location
- Lockport New York
one of my first lessons as an electrician was the difference between ground and neutral after the first means of disconnect. I was told today that code was changed in 2014. Is this true?
one of my first lessons as an electrician was the difference between ground and neutral after the first means of disconnect. I was told today that code was changed in 2014. Is this true?
That's reversed. The neutrals and grounds should be on the same neutral bar in the main panel and should be separated in the sub panel.I have to say Im sorry again no wonder you didn,t understand the question . the neutral and ground were seperated at the first means of disconnect. there was also a sub panel which had both neutral and ground under the same buss.
There was no such change. The most recent changes that are somewhat close to this situation changed the other way around and required separate grounding conductor where you used to be able to use the neutral for equipment grounding, in past 50+ years they never added conditions to combine neutral and grounding conductors beyond the service or source of a separately derived system.sorry . i guess instead of asking is this true. I should have said how is this possible. To clarify I opened a main breaker panel. and the neutrals and grounds were under the same buss bar. and grounded to the to the panel.when I pointed this out to the the electrician on the job site he told me that the code was changed in 2014. am I missing something. I didn't realize this was a code.but how a 3 wire system functioned.
That's what I thought. But this "electrician" was quite adamant about the whole thing. I haven't worked as an electrician in the residential field in over 15 years. There's been a lot of changes so I didn't push the fact that the ground and neutral are the same at the first means of disconnect. Am I wrong to assume that this is not a code that would ever change. The way it was explained to me was it is a major safety factor. Thanks for your input.
That's what I thought. But this "electrician" was quite adamant about the whole thing. I haven't worked as an electrician in the residential field in over 15 years. There's been a lot of changes so I didn't push the fact that the ground and neutral are the same at the first means of disconnect. Am I wrong to assume that this is not a code that would ever change. The way it was explained to me was it is a major safety factor. Thanks for your input.
That's what I thought. But this "electrician" was quite adamant about the whole thing. I haven't worked as an electrician in the residential field in over 15 years. There's been a lot of changes so I didn't push the fact that the ground and neutral are the same at the first means of disconnect. Am I wrong to assume that this is not a code that would ever change. The way it was explained to me was it is a major safety factor. Thanks for your input.
Yes that was a somewhat recent change, but doesn't jive with what the guy mentioned in post 4 was saying to justify what he had done.Note that we need to bond the EGC's to the grounded conductor to have a back to the source to trip the OCPD during a fault. The only way this could ever change would if there was a drastic change in how we do things, like going with ungrounded systems, or the utility serving us with separate neutrals and grounds and the bond point on the utility side. Perhaps this was a detached structure served by a feeder and not a service? If so, that is a code that has recently changed as we cant "rebond" the neutral and ground in a remote structure anymore.
I opened a main breaker panel. and the neutrals and grounds were under the same buss bar. and grounded to the to the panel.when I pointed this out to the the electrician on the job site he told me that the code was changed in 2014. am I missing something. I didn't realize this was a code.but how a 3 wire system functioned.
