Rolling sphere method

Status
Not open for further replies.

arunavac

Member
Hi
in my project i have to show zone of protection of a 114 mtr high chimney according to rolling sphere method as per NFPA780.then what will be the radius of rolling sphere and method.please advice
 
I was going to close this, by virtue of its having no relationship to the electrical industry. Then I looked up NFPA 780. It has to do with lightning protection systems. So it is related. But it would have been helpful to say a little more, and to save us the trouble of trying to understand the question.

That said, I no nothing about lightning protection. Perhaps some other member can assist.
 
It looks like the zone of protection goes straight down the stack untill it reachs the 46m diameter sphere that is touching the stack and then all of the area under the sphere is protected. See NFPA 480, 4.7.3.2. You can view that document online for free at NFPA.org. You do have to register to view it.
 
You can get free information on lighting protection and grounding: http://www.usda.gov/rus/electric/pubs/1724e300/1724e300.pdf

4.7.3.4.2 Rolling Sphere Method: The rolling sphere method involves rolling an imaginary sphere of a prescribed radius over the substation. The sphere rolls up and over (and is supported by) lightning masts, shield wires, and other grounded metal objects intended for lightning shielding. A piece of equipment is protected from a direct stroke if it remains below the curved surface of the sphere by virtue of the sphere’s being elevated by shield wires or other devices. Equipment that touches the sphere or penetrates its surface is not protected.


The radius of the sphere is determined by calculating the strike distance. The strike distance is the length of the final jump of the stepped leader as its potential exceeds the breakdown resistance of the last gap of air to ground.


 
Last edited:
sounds like you need to design an aerial grounding ring for the structure and play with the layout, distances, and size of sphere to make it work for you.
 
sounds like you need to design an aerial grounding ring for the structure and play with the layout, distances, and size of sphere to make it work for you.
The size of the sphere for the rolling sphere method is specified at a diameter of 46m in NFPA 780.
 
Rolling ball theroy

Rolling ball theroy

Well we had a job with large cooling towers and they used a program to simulate a rolling ball at a certain speed off the top of each tower this ball would roll off and when it hit the ground earth that was your area of protection .Meaning ligthing protection of that covered area just thought id add this to the posts .sorry if i offended any one just a thought .take care
 
Well we had a job with large cooling towers and they used a program to simulate a rolling ball at a certain speed off the top of each tower this ball would roll off and when it hit the ground earth that was your area of protection .Meaning ligthing protection of that covered area just thought id add this to the posts .sorry if i offended any one just a thought .take care
That would not be in compliance with the method stated in NFPA 780, Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems.
 
Rolling ball theory

Rolling ball theory

Well so your saying that the engineering firm at this project is not performing by NFPA regs or rules . may we explain how it works . This program simulates a structure of any type size that you input to program it simulates a round ball at a rate of speed pitched off top /center of structure at speed then its propelled out off edge of structure and now air born starts to drop to earth now that area of protective cover is in that scope of the rolling ball off top of stucture the canopy of protection . I tell the electrical engineers Black &vech that its a issue and we are not going by the NFPA . take care i just knew i should not have posted this but we call it the Rolling Ball Theory
 
Well so your saying that the engineering firm at this project is not performing by NFPA regs or rules . may we explain how it works . This program simulates a structure of any type size that you input to program it simulates a round ball at a rate of speed pitched off top /center of structure at speed then its propelled out off edge of structure and now air born starts to drop to earth now that area of protective cover is in that scope of the rolling ball off top of stucture the canopy of protection . I tell the electrical engineers Black &vech that its a issue and we are not going by the NFPA . take care i just knew i should not have posted this but we call it the Rolling Ball Theory
The standard does call for the use of the rolling sphere method, however it is not pushed off at a speed and propelled out from the edge. It is just placed on the building and its points of protection, and rolled around the structure, and anything under the sphere is considered to be protected. You can go to NFPA.org and look at section 4.7.3. It shows how the rolling sphere is to be used to determine the zones of protection. I can see a program like you speak of being used for this method, but just not as you have described it.
 
Rolling ball program

Rolling ball program

Well yes we have seen the standard and know how it works but its outdated and old there is a new way to give the cover of protection now the rolling ball is a program simulated does the same thing just in a different way . I will ask at work to see how or why we are not following the NFPA ? How do we use a different method to get the same results and on a high profile project is this maybe a more stringent method of the known method in the NFPA or has time crept up on the regs ? Best to ya
 
Rolling sphere method

According to NFPA 780-2008, the zone of protection is, "4.7.3.2* For structure heights exceeding 46m above earth or above a lower strike termination device, the zone of protection shall be the space in the vertical plane between the points of contact, and also under the sphere where the sphere is resting against a vertical surface of the structure and the lower strike termination device(s) or earth."
 
I was going to close this, by virtue of its having no relationship to the electrical industry. Then I looked up NFPA 780. It has to do with lightning protection systems. So it is related. But it would have been helpful to say a little more, and to save us the trouble of trying to understand the question.

That said, I no nothing about lightning protection. Perhaps some other member can assist.

i think this is the first ever lightning question in this forum. Just when i was going to demand it be changed to Lighting.... ;)
 
Lighting strikes at gainsville

Lighting strikes at gainsville

Well it was never a subject one would have much to say or could really teach as they still study its effects or what it is and why .

There is a place in gainsville florida its the capital of lighting strikes its been said to have more strikes then any place on earth yearly ? I think florida has the highest record of strikes in the USA.

There is a grant project a kinda lighting research facility there they actually shoot rockets up into the clouds and the current passes thur a wire to earth and they record all data about lighting and its effects .

I always wondered how one would harness its power ?
I always thought tesla knew how to harness its great power or maybe be able to store its energy and use it .

Someone said once and i think it was Tesla ? That if you hung a wire up into the sky from ground earth and it ran back down to earth one big loop the magnetic field of the earth itself would induce a voltage in that wire and produce a small voltage ?

Think of it could we some how make or generate power from the sky everyone wants a new way to make or generate power our earth is a magnet with poles it turns na i must be crazy to think that ? Thinking about it i really think Tesla knew how ? comments take care
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top