It probably isn't exactly kosher to take the wires out of the jacket and use them as pigtails, however I bet every house in existence that has any wire extension or pigtails to switches and receptacles is by Romex that's been stripped down.
What's the problem with doing that, is it any different than attaching directly to the NM conductors in the box?
Although a real nitpicky and ridiculous thing, Theoretically I do agree with JF. NM inners are not article 310 conductors.
It probably isn't exactly kosher to take the wires out of the jacket and use them as pigtails, however I bet every house in existence that has any wire extension or pigtails to switches and receptacles is by Romex that's been stripped down.
Although a real nitpicky and ridiculous thing, Theoretically I do agree with JF. NM inners are not article 310 conductors.
Do you have a specific code section?
Do you have a specific code section?
Isn't because they don't have wire markings?
I checked a bunch of data sheets on NM cable from different manufacturers. Most just say the conductors have PVC insulation; one says they have PVC insulation of the thickness required for THHN conductors; and CME Cable's datasheet says "Single conductors are dual rated THHN/THWN, meeting 90 °C Dry, 75 °C Wet." ( http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec01-bwx/bwx-09-nmb.pdf )NM inners are not article 310 conductors.
I checked a bunch of data sheets on NM cable from different manufacturers. Most just say the conductors have PVC insulation; one says they have PVC insulation of the thickness required for THHN conductors; and CME Cable's datasheet says "Single conductors are dual rated THHN/THWN, meeting 90 °C Dry, 75 °C Wet." ( http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec01-bwx/bwx-09-nmb.pdf )
So with CME Cable's product, would you still have an objection?
Cheers, Wayne
Its a bit of a mystery whats inside ramen. No one really knows what type of conductors the inners are. But yes I agree with Rob, 334 tells us what the temperature rating is.
No mystery.....UL 719 is clear....it is THHN/THWN-2 (more THHN) equivalent.
LOL..umm...Im sure as I am kinda intimate with UL 719.Are you sure? I would like to see the language if you can post that sentance. UL719 is copyrighted and costs like $500 so I have never seen the wording. The sections I have seen , do not state such.