iwirehouses
Senior Member
Can I run NM up the side of a chimney to get from the basement to either the first or second floor? Maybe only if its in conduit? Or if its on a runner?
iwirehouses said:Can I run NM up the side of a chimney.....
infinity said:Sure. If the wall space is open when you install it, it would need to be secured and supported. If this were an existing enclosed chimney the cable could be fished in without support. This is very common around here when running new circuits in an old house. Drop a string with a small chain attached to the end down the side of the chimney and fish in new cables.
iwirehouses said:no, inside. thank you infinity.
Shockedby277v said:I may be mistaken but would a chimney be concidered a plenum?? And that would be found in 300.22 ... 2002. It don't say anything about abandoned chimneys that I can see. That's assuming it's an abandoned chimney. And if it's abandoned it would no longer be concidered a plenum because it would no longer be part of the air distribution system. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Shockedby277v said:That is why I am posting. I don't really know. It distributes it outside doesn't it?? A fireplace is mainly for heating the air. My assumption would be it would be part of the system.
No. The combustion device doesn't even necessarily get it's supply from the room. In the houses I wire, there is a special combustion supply duct run to the furnace, for the furnace to breathe with.Shockedby277v said:Wouldn't a chimney contribute to the air we breathe by distributing the smoke outside. So the chimney would be part of the environmental air distribution system even though it isn't in such a direct manner.
georgestolz said:That's the purpose of 300.22, to limit the poisonous gasses distributed by the ventilation system to the occupants in the event of a fire.
110.11 Deteriorating Agents.
Unless identified for use in the operating environment, no conductors or equipment shall be located in damp or wet locations; where exposed to gases, fumes, vapors, liquids, or other agents that have a deteriorating effect on the conductors or equipment; or where exposed to excessive temperatures.......
Not closely enough.iwire said:Have you looked at 300.22(A)?
What is the point of 300.22(A)?300.22(A) has nothing to do with recirculation.
I'm bumping this, because I don't understand it.What is the point of 300.22(A)?