iwire said:
I can not agree with that, our trade is far to diverse to expect one person to be knowledgeable in it all.
Okay, I'll reword that Bob. First and foremost, it's perfectly fine to disagree, and I respect your words. I do not like the title of "Master". I have met two real MASTERS in my lifetime. Two gentlemen that would FLOOR you with knowledge, anywhere from .01A applications to hundreds of thousands of A services. If I could acquire a "Masters" license, I would never announce it.
I am not really sure how to word or state my objective on this. But really what I meant is "Master" to me is a word that very, very few could hold, regardless of the exams you take. I have worked with MANY, o' many of tech's in my life, I have only run across two MASTERS.
For all of the Master license holding people here, please understand my point of view. Again, I have only met two individuals you couldn't stump on theory or applications. They are both in their 50's, both in t-shirts and worn out jeans, smart as smart could be in the field.
You're very right Bob, the field is extremely broad. It wasn't so broad to these gentlemen, they were, excuse me, are in MY eyes,.....MASTERS. They definetly hold they title, more than I can say for anyone else I have ever had the pleasure to work with:smile:
Here's another stab. If I was to acquire my Masters, and you put me in a picture with Mike Holt, do you think we'd be equal? To me, "Master" is just a VERY hard title to defend.