I have a situation that I can't resolve.
SDS system with outside pad transformer supplying a panel at separate building.
Transformer secondary circuit consist of 3 phases and a neutral with no wire type SSBJ.
Conduit system from the transformer to the panel is rigid conduit which I understand can be used as the SSBJ however the contractor installed a section of LFMC for the last few feet of the run and the LFMC is not an adequate grounding means for the current involved.
I can't use the exceptions in 250.30 to omit the SSBJ as I have a parallel path even though it has limited ampacity based on 250.118
To add to the dilemma the panel is connected to a UFER and ground ring at the building and the grounding electrode conductor extends direct buried to the pad transformer so essentially it is serving as a SSBJ although it's not run with the power conductors.
Plus, 250.102 requires the conduit be bonded which can be accomplished at the transformer but the LFMC will then be an objectionable path albeit limited by 250.118.
Any input on the steps necessary to mike the install Code compliant would be appreciated.
SDS system with outside pad transformer supplying a panel at separate building.
Transformer secondary circuit consist of 3 phases and a neutral with no wire type SSBJ.
Conduit system from the transformer to the panel is rigid conduit which I understand can be used as the SSBJ however the contractor installed a section of LFMC for the last few feet of the run and the LFMC is not an adequate grounding means for the current involved.
I can't use the exceptions in 250.30 to omit the SSBJ as I have a parallel path even though it has limited ampacity based on 250.118
To add to the dilemma the panel is connected to a UFER and ground ring at the building and the grounding electrode conductor extends direct buried to the pad transformer so essentially it is serving as a SSBJ although it's not run with the power conductors.
Plus, 250.102 requires the conduit be bonded which can be accomplished at the transformer but the LFMC will then be an objectionable path albeit limited by 250.118.
Any input on the steps necessary to mike the install Code compliant would be appreciated.
Last edited: