Seal-off at explosion-proof motor?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jon456

Senior Member
Location
Colorado
My understanding of seal-offs is that they are required at hazardous location boundaries, and where needed to isolate potentially arcing components (like switches). If an electric motor is rated as explosion-proof, I don't believe it requires a seal-off where the conduit enters the junction box housing the wiring splices. Is this correct?
 
... Is this correct?
Conditionally. :roll:

See 501.15 for the specifics... but as an example, if the [raceway, cable] entry to the peckerhead is 2" or larger, seals are required. And for clarity, that assumes there will be splices in the peckerhead. :D
 
Conditionally. :roll:

See 501.15 for the specifics... but as an example, if the [raceway, cable] entry to the peckerhead is 2" or larger, seals are required. And for clarity, that assumes there will be splices in the peckerhead. :D
I have read about the seal-off requirement on conduit 2" or larger. Sorry for not mentioning that this is 1/2" rigid metallic conduit.

Other than certain particular people, I have no idea what a peckerhead is.
 
The "formal" term is motor terminal housing (Section 430.12) but motor terminal box or junction box are probably more common and perfectly acceptable.

You also failed to mention whether the motor was required to be explosionproof. Simply because it is explosionproof does not necessarily require it to be sealed in Division 2. Most three-phase motors in Division 2 are not required to be explosionproof and most single-phase motors in Division 2 are required to be.

Most explosionproof motors have a factory seal installed between the motor terminal housing and the main motor enclosure. Such motors will have a marking on the terminal housing stating it is factory sealed or something similar. The 2 inch entry seal applies only to Division 1.
 
The "formal" term is motor terminal housing (Section 430.12) but motor terminal box or junction box are probably more common and perfectly acceptable.

You also failed to mention whether the motor was required to be explosionproof. Simply because it is explosionproof does not necessarily require it to be sealed in Division 2. Most three-phase motors in Division 2 are not required to be explosionproof and most single-phase motors in Division 2 are required to be.

Most explosionproof motors have a factory seal installed between the motor terminal housing and the main motor enclosure. Such motors will have a marking on the terminal housing stating it is factory sealed or something similar. The 2 inch entry seal applies only to Division 1.
Thank you again for your elucidation.

The motor is single-phase, 240VAC; it is in a Class 1 Division 2 area. It does have a factory seal between the motor terminal housing and the main motor enclosure.
 
Thank you again for your elucidation.

The motor is single-phase, 240VAC; it is in a Class 1 Division 2 area. It does have a factory seal between the motor terminal housing and the main motor enclosure.
So what is your conclusion: seal required or not?
 
So what is your conclusion: seal required or not?
I conclude that no seal-off is required at the motor terminal box. However, there will be a seal-off within 18" of the explosion-proof switch that energizes the motor. And there will be a seal-off on the conduit bringing power to the equipment pad where that conduit exits the Class 1 Div 2 boundary.
 
I conclude that no seal-off is required at the motor terminal box. However, there will be a seal-off within 18" of the explosion-proof switch that energizes the motor. And there will be a seal-off on the conduit bringing power to the equipment pad where that conduit exits the Class 1 Div 2 boundary.
Sounds good to me. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top