If it's not ran through thermal insulation then you can use the 75 deg column.We are on the 2014 code and it will be ran from a feed-through disconnect located beside of meter base and ran in the crawl space and then up through the floor to the range receptacle mounted on the floor.
Until July 1.We are on the 2014 code . . .
Is Va. adopting the 2017 July 1?Until July 1.
If I'm not mistaken, it already has, and will actually be removing the 2014 option.Is Va. adopting the 2017 July 1?
Is #8 SER commonly available? I've only ever seen and used #6.
If this is your own home. I would recommend using #8 cu on a 40 amp breaker. I generally treat customers homes like it were my own.Can #8 SER AL be used for an electric range on a 40 amp breaker? I know that romex has to be used in the 60° colum but was wondering about SER cable.
Would there be a problem using #8 AL on a 40 amp breaker? I generally use 6/3 romex on a 50 amp breaker. And we used to use 6 AL on a 50 amp breaker years ago and with the high cost of copper, have entertained the thought of using AL on some circuits that we used to use back in the day.If this is your own home. I would recommend using #8 cu on a 40 amp breaker. I generally treat customers homes like it were my own.
They have everything in Beaverton! Someday I will go there and see this mythical Platt distribution center!could have next day83SERGX250 :: 8/3 SE/SER Aluminum 250' :: PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
(3) 8 AWG and (1) 8 AWG Bare Ground, SE/SER, 600V, Aluminum Conductor, PVC Jacket, 250 ft. Reel., Cat #: 83SERGX250, Mfr: Multiplewww.platt.com
Would there be a problem using #8 AL on a 40 amp breaker? I generally use 6/3 romex on a 50 amp breaker. And we used to use 6 AL on a 50 amp breaker years ago and with the high cost of copper, have entertained the thought of using AL on some circuits that we used to use back in the day.
I believe this is fine. 338.10(B)(4) has some restriction for thermal insulation plus 10awg and smaller.Can #8 SER AL be used for an electric range on a 40 amp breaker? I know that romex has to be used in the 60° colum but was wondering about SER cable.
The code writers did a bunch of hand wringing and wasted time resources that they should have used to improve other parts of the code that desperately need it, and fiddling around with ampacity of SER for several code cycles before putting it back to where it was originally.What revision of the NEC is that from? Some of the comments above seemed to say that the answer to the original question depends on whether you go by the 2014 or the 2017 code.
This is a 2017 Nec handbook with author commentary. The 6 commentators all appear to be NFPA engineers of some sortWhat revision of the NEC is that from? Some of the comments above seemed to say that the answer to the original question depends on whether you go by the 2014 or the 2017 code.