Service Entrance Cable

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Service Entrance Cable

See Article 338 Service Entrance Cable, section 338.10 Uses Permitted. (A)....and (B)(4).
 
Re: Service Entrance Cable

USE cable is only permitted for use outside a building. It is not even listed for going into service equipment that is on the inside of an outside wall. The reason is that USE has not passed the vertical flame test. Most USE has a dual (or more) listing of USE/XHHW and is permitted to be used inside for building wiring as XHHW wire or cable.

the -2 that follows the type letters indicates that the cable is rated for 90 degrees C in wet or dry locations. Therefore, RHW-2 is good for 90 degrees C even though it only has a single H in the type designation.

Keep in mind that the 90 degree C is for derating only since there are no terminations that are listed for use at 90 degrees C in equipment. :D
 
Re: Service Entrance Cable

Charlie,

According to 338.10(B)(4)(b),"Type USE shall be permitted to be terminated in enclosures at an indoor location where Type USE cable emerges from the ground. The length of the cable extending indoors to the first termination shall not exceed 6 ft."

Can you clarify your statement. Thanks
 
Re: Service Entrance Cable

Joek

I do not see the part you have quoted, are you sure of the numbers?

338.10(B)(4)(b) Exterior Installations. In addition to the provisions of this article, service-entrance cable used for feeders or branch circuits, where installed as exterior wiring, shall be installed as required by Article 225. The cable shall be supported in accordance with 334.30, unless used as messenger-supported wiring as allowed by Article 396.

Type USE cable shall be installed outside in accordance with the provisions of Article 340. Where Type USE cable emerges from the ground at terminations, it shall be protected in accordance with 300.5(D).

Multiconductor service-entrance cable shall be permitted to be installed as messenger-supported wiring in accordance with Articles 225 and 396.
 
Re: Service Entrance Cable

Bob, read the second paragraph under 338.10(B)(4)(b). "Type USE cable shall be installed outside in accordance with the provisions of Article 340. Type USE shall be permitted to be terminated in enclosures at an indoor location where Type USE cable emerges from the ground. The length of the cable extending indoors to the first termination box shall not exceed 1.8m (6 ft.)."
 
Re: Service Entrance Cable

Amptech what I posted is a cut and paste job right from the NEC on CD-ROM. :)

It looks like we have a discrepancy, where are you getting your quote from?

I think my book is at the job but I will take a look here for it. :confused:
 
Re: Service Entrance Cable

Amptech you got me checking and my code book has the wording that both you and joek posted, my CD-ROM does not have that wording.

I went to the NFPA website and checked the Errata Sheet for this code.

I found that my CD-ROM is correct and my Book is incorrect.

20. Page 70-186 338.10(B)(4)(b): Revise second paragraph to read:

?Type USE cable shall be installed outside in accordance with the provisions of Article 340. Where Type USE cable emerges from the ground at terminations, it shall be protected in accordance with 300.5(D). Multiconductor service entrance cable shall be permitted to be installed as messenger-supported wiring in accordance with Articles 225 and 396.?
You can get the errata here

[ February 22, 2004, 08:11 PM: Message edited by: iwire ]
 
Re: Service Entrance Cable

"Errata
338.10(B)(4)(b): Revise second paragraph to read:
"Type USE cable shall be installed outside in accordance with the provisions of Article 340. Where Type USE cable emerges from the ground at terminations, it shall be protected in accordance with 300.5(D). Multiconductor service entrance cable shall be permitted to be installed as messenger-supported wiring in accordance with Articles 225 and 396."

This errata has deleted the sentence
"The length of the cable extending indoors to the first termination box shall not exceed 1.8m(6 ft)."

My answer stands, sorry I took so long to get back. I have not done my research but I will guess that the NFPA put a change into the Code that the Code Making Panel had approved in the proposal stage and then rejected during the comment stage because of objections to this material being inside a building. A mistake was made by staff when it was not removed.
 
Re: Service Entrance Cable

Thanks Charlie. I didn't catch that in the errata. With that paragraph removed, you are indeed correct!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top