While it is arguably a safer system, I don't believe that the NEC has any provisions for services that have separate grounded and equipment grounding conductors. You are _required_ to bond ground and neutral somewhere at or between the service drop and the main disconnect. But if you have a _separate_ grounded conductor and EGC, you would not want this bond, because it would create a parallel path in the EGC, and the bond at the transformer would provide the required path for ground fault current.
If the transformer is customer owned (and therefore a 'separately derived system' rather than a 'service'), then the bond is permitted anywhere between the transformer and the first disconnect.
If the circuit with separate grounded conductor and EGC were run from one customer building to another, and therefore an outside feeder rather than a service, the separate grounded conductor and EGC would be permitted without bonding.
-Jon