kevinware
Senior Member
- Location
- Louisville, KY
Good after noon everyone,
I need some opinions on NEC section 230.28. My situation is this: I am upgrading the service on a 80 year old house, don't worry the house itself is structurally sound it just has a 60 amp service panel right now and I am looking to upgrade it to the minimum 100 amp. My question deals with the overhead service mast support. Table 310.15(B)(6) tells me the minimum conductor size I should use is #4 AWG (copper). Using three conductors annex "C" table "C8" under THHN/THWN tells me I can use 1" RMC. (so far so good? or should I use THW?) As the service exist now on the house it looks like it will not meet compliance with 230.24(B)(2) so I was going to install a service mast using 1" RMC. The mast will be a through-the-roof installation close to a corner so I was going to try to apply 230.24(A) exception No. 3. What all this rambling on boils down to is this I guess. Section 230.28 makes this statement "Mast shall be of adequate strength or be supported by brace or guys to withstand safely the strain imposed by the service drop". How do I know what adequate strength is? If I can apply 230.24(A) exception No. 3 and get my 18" clearance and still have 12 feet over the driveway I understand I don't need a brace to support the mast, but if I have to go 3 feet above the roof with 1" RMC do I need to start thinking about guys and braces or will 1" RMC be strong enough to handle the strain? Please give me your opinion on this ideal and my application of the NEC.
Thanks for all your help,
Kevin
I need some opinions on NEC section 230.28. My situation is this: I am upgrading the service on a 80 year old house, don't worry the house itself is structurally sound it just has a 60 amp service panel right now and I am looking to upgrade it to the minimum 100 amp. My question deals with the overhead service mast support. Table 310.15(B)(6) tells me the minimum conductor size I should use is #4 AWG (copper). Using three conductors annex "C" table "C8" under THHN/THWN tells me I can use 1" RMC. (so far so good? or should I use THW?) As the service exist now on the house it looks like it will not meet compliance with 230.24(B)(2) so I was going to install a service mast using 1" RMC. The mast will be a through-the-roof installation close to a corner so I was going to try to apply 230.24(A) exception No. 3. What all this rambling on boils down to is this I guess. Section 230.28 makes this statement "Mast shall be of adequate strength or be supported by brace or guys to withstand safely the strain imposed by the service drop". How do I know what adequate strength is? If I can apply 230.24(A) exception No. 3 and get my 18" clearance and still have 12 feet over the driveway I understand I don't need a brace to support the mast, but if I have to go 3 feet above the roof with 1" RMC do I need to start thinking about guys and braces or will 1" RMC be strong enough to handle the strain? Please give me your opinion on this ideal and my application of the NEC.
Thanks for all your help,
Kevin