Services

Status
Not open for further replies.

wmeek

Senior Member
Location
Texas
Occupation
Electrician
I am in the process of changing out A service panel and was wandering if someone can tell me if you can splice the Neutral in a Meter Can
 

charlie

Senior Member
Location
Indianapolis
Re: Services

Yes, but you better check with the serving electric utility first. If it were on the IPL system, we would not hook up the service with splices (I would bet we are not the only ones). The bottom line is that the Code doesn't prohibit splices inside the meter fitting.

What I am wondering is why. It sounds like you messed up and are trying to wiggle out of a tight spot without spending any money. :confused:
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Re: Services

Charlie,
I wonder if this question is related to an old requirement that Illinois Power had? When I started, the neutral had to pass through the meter to the service disconnect in one piece. You were not permitted to have one length of wire from the weatherhead to the meter and a second length from the meter to the disconnect. The neutral lugs in the meter were of a "lay in" type to make this possible.
Don
 

hbiss

EC, Westchester, New York NEC: 2014
Location
Hawthorne, New York NEC: 2014
Occupation
EC
Re: Services

I've never seen a meter pan that didn't have two lugs for the neutral and a neutral bus down the center. How would you run a type SE neutral through the pan without at least twisting the strands together to go in one lay in lug? Probably could be done but I've never had to. We've always used two pieces.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Re: Services

hbiss,
Illinois Power has not permitted the use of SE cable since before I started in '73 so that wasn't an issue. The meter can would accept two neutrals (one in and one out), but IP wouldn't. This rule changed in the late 70s.
Don
 

charlie

Senior Member
Location
Indianapolis
Re: Services

WOW! You are talking about the old round meter fittings that have the swing away lugs that are held together by the screw that clamps the wire. I don't think we have many of those on our system any more. We issued those for 60 ampere services but we never required the grounded conductor to go through in one piece. I remember the grounded conductor doing just that but it was not a requirement.

[ July 26, 2003, 08:16 AM: Message edited by: charlie ]
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Re: Services

Charlie,
The 60 amp ones were round, but the 100 amp ones were square. They both had a lug where you could remove the top part of the lug, lay the wire in the bottom part, and then reinstall the top part and tighten the set screws.
Don
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Services

The meter base is the most hazardous component of a service. A LG fault, in the meter base, will likely burn clear before any protective device actuates.

The neutral must be landed, in the base, to permit operation of the meter.
 

charlie

Senior Member
Location
Indianapolis
Re: Services

Don, we issued 100 ampere round meter fittings of the type lugs you describe. Additionally, some of the more modern meter fittings had that type lugs.

Bennie, I don't like your comment but you are absolutely correct about the line to ground fault. However, the neutral is not required for the meter to operate unless it is a three phase meter where a neutral potential is required. A single phase meter will pick up the 240 volt nominal from a phase to phase coil for the voltage reference.
 

txsparky

Member
Location
Conroe, Texas
Re: Services

Ive never understood why an overhead service (in my area) requires the grounded conductor to be unspliced through the meter can to the panel. But if it is an underground service, we terminate our grounded conductor in the meter can and then the PoCo. terminates theirs in the meter can. The meter cans are exactly alike. (2 lugs on the neutral buss)
 

gwz2

Senior Member
Location
Indiana
Re: Services

Check 230.75.

I believe some of the meters were designed for this purpose by having the "separator" mounting bolt or divider in the grounded conductor so that the grounded conductor could NOT pass straight thru the meter lug.
 

charlie

Senior Member
Location
Indianapolis
Re: Services

Originally posted by gwz2:
Check 230.75. I believe some of the meters were designed for this purpose by having the "separator" mounting bolt or divider in the grounded conductor so that the grounded conductor could NOT pass straight thru the meter lug.
Glenn, 230.75 applies to the service equipment. 230.66 states "Individual meter socket enclosures shall not be considered service equipment."

The grounded conductor is not required by the Code to pass through the meter fitting unbroken and I have no idea as to the reason any electric utility or AHJ would require it to be unbroken. :confused:
 

gregoryelectricinc

Senior Member
Re: Services

Perhaps there is a little bit of misunderstanding going on here. It appears to me that some are referring to to incoming "grounded" conductor from the utility company, while others may be refrring to the GEC (bare # 6 or 4 or other appropriate size) going to water pipe or other Grounding Electrode. The second wire i refer to must remain unbroken if it passes through the meter can as well as be bonded to BOTH ends of any metal conduit nipples it passes through. Just a thought. I am not aware of any utility companies or inspectors in outr area that would require th incoming grounded conductor)the one in your risor, overhead or underground) to be unbroken.
 

charlie

Senior Member
Location
Indianapolis
Re: Services

Originally posted by gregoryelectricinc:
Perhaps there is a little bit of misunderstanding going on here.
I don't know about any misunderstanding. I have reviewed all the posts and the only terminology is grounded conductor and neutral. I would hope we are all talking about the same current carrying conductor. :eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top