"Shall be permitted" is not required, but "shall not be permitted" is required to not do?

Status
Not open for further replies.

adamaero

Member
Location
US
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
410.16

Incandescent luminaires with open or partially enclosed lamps and pendant luminaires or lampholders shall not be permitted.

It seems that "shall be permitted" means there are other options. On the other hand "shall not be permitted" is not ever allowed. Right?
 

adamaero

Member
Location
US
Occupation
Electrical Engineer

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
Yes, I read. The point is how they use "permitted" to be optional there, but in parts of the Code where they use "not permitted" they seem to mean it is required and not optional (to not do that).

If you dig down into the logic you should be able to see the difference between the two without the superficial appearance of contradition.
Another way of covering the three possible cases is to use the words forbidden, permitted, and required.
There forbidden means you must not do it. Permitted means that you may choose between doing it and not doing it. Required means that you must do it.
From a strictly logical point of view not permitted should mean that it is either forbidden or required but does not tell you which. But the English language does not work that way and so not permitted is equivalent to forbidden.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top