Can a 480v and a 120v circuit from separate panels fed by the same MDP share an EGC if it's installed in the same raceway and sized per 250.122?
obviously there's a transformer in between but it seems this might be paralleling EGC's
Welcome to the forum.
IMO,,,If there fed from seperate panels, then one of them, would not be making its' way back to the source, Making it a violation of 250.6 (a), 250.4 (a) (5)
if they came from the same panel, 250.122 (c) allows it. IMO
Or if it split back to both directions once the circuit conductors split.
Can a 480v and a 120v circuit from separate panels fed by the same MDP share an EGC if it's installed in the same raceway and sized per 250.122?
obviously there's a transformer in between but it seems this might be paralleling EGC's
Huh?
If the circuits originate from different panels, wouldn't that still be a violation of 250.6 (a), 250.4 (a) (5)?
Since there is a transformer involved (assuming a SDS) you would need a separate EGC for each circuit.
I see no problem or violation, in fact we do it all the time. For instance if we had 408 site poles that have 125 vol receptacles on them. One EGC for both.
I see no problem or violation, in fact we do it all the time. For instance if we had 408 site poles that have 125 vol receptacles on them. One EGC for both.
IMO no not at all.
Picture this
You leave a 480 panel and 208 panel with circuit conductors and an EGC each, they join together in a J-box, at that point you combine the EGCs and continue on in one raceway with all the circuit conductors and the combined EGC. Now when you get to the far end you split the circuits into different raceways each with an EGC.
I see no problem or violation, in fact we do it all the time. For instance if we had 408 site poles that have 125 vol receptacles on them. One EGC for both.
The same thing would happen with conduits that are electrically connected, which they would be when strapped to strut, for example.