Greg1707
Senior Member
- Location
- Alexandria, VA
- Occupation
- Business owner Electrical contractor
Is it really going to be two services or one service drop shared?
Is this really considered two structures?
The plan is to share the wire from the street.
Imo, you can share the rods
There are two houses. There is a meter on the rear on one and we will be installing a meter on the side of the other house.Yes, but can he have two services.
Is what is shown both of those houses? End result being a two family dwelling.There are two houses. There is a meter on the rear on one and we will be installing a meter on the side of the other house.
Yes, but can he have two services.
They appear very much attached. Are they both on the same property?There are two houses. There is a meter on the rear on one and we will be installing a meter on the side of the other house.
If you read 250.53, I believe that code requires not only separate ground rods, but that the ground rods be separated by a minimum distance.
If you share the ground rods, then you have the same sort of problem associated with common metallic water piping: neutral current flowing via the shared grounding electrodes and through the neighbor's neutral.
Physics wise, I think it would be preferable to share the ground rods; otherwise currents through the soil could enter one set of ground rods, travel through the neutral wires, and exit the other set of ground rods. But I don't think that is what the code says.
-Jon
How many older neighborhoods do you have with metal water piping and all services bonded to that water piping?Exactly...In Washington we have a state code rule that prohibits sharing ground rods since you will have the bldg. neutrals in parallel and will have objectionable current.
Based on the photo in the OP, this is one structure. 2.
Exactly...In Washington we have a state code rule that prohibits sharing ground rods since you will have the bldg. neutrals in parallel and will have objectionable current.
If you read 250.53, I believe that code requires not only separate ground rods, but that the ground rods be separated by a minimum distance.
If you share the ground rods, then you have the same sort of problem associated with common metallic water piping: neutral current flowing via the shared grounding electrodes and through the neighbor's neutral.
Physics wise, I think it would be preferable to share the ground rods; otherwise currents through the soil could enter one set of ground rods, travel through the neutral wires, and exit the other set of ground rods. But I don't think that is what the code says.
-Jon
IMO there is only one condition which determines one vs. two GES's, and that is whether or not the buildings are on one or two properties.I think you are confusing the requirement to have individual electrodes such as ground rods to have a minimum separation of 6' as required in 250.53. This only applies to the INDIVIDUAL ground rods-not the grounding electrode system. All electrodes in a GES must be bonded together.
And as I mentioned in my previous post, 250.58 requires all systems in a building use the same GES.
As for Tom's remarks about Washington State requirements for separate GES for each disconnect, well, I'm not sure what to say about that as it is a direct violation of the NEC.