electrocat13
Member
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Occupation
- Electical Engineer
Hi! I do alot of arc flash studies in SKM, and would like help understanding something I come across. Why don't the SKM calculated load-side short circuit values match with the values given to me by the utility company?
So I will reach out to a utility company to get a site's short circuit information, and sometimes I receive the short circuit current values for the line side AND load side of the utility transformer. I also request X/R values and the utility transformer's KVA, Z%, V_LL, and upstream fuse. Then I plug the LINE side SC values and XF values into my SKM model and run short circuit. Typically the SKM calculated short circuit values on the secondary side of the transformer is much much higher than the values given to me by utility. Why is that?
I would think less about this if both values were similar, but typically they're very very different. For example 900A Vs. 3200A. Is it just a result of "real-life" losses vs. theoretical calculations? Is there another value I should request from the utility company to more accurately calculate the secondary values? Should I start adding a tolerance to Z% and adjusting the SC options to include the tolerance to get a closer secondary SC value? Is there an another solution to showing the utility values at the transformer secondary that I'm just missing completely? lol
I know I can lower Z% to adjust the values, but I don't really want to show a discrepancy between the model values and what the utility company gave me. I'm sure y'all know how enough discrepancies, even minor and with good reason, can make a customer raise an eyebrow. Plus I'm just curious.
I've seen other studies just remove the utility xf, and simply put the secondary SC values as the "utility". However, I think it's nice to have the utility xf and fuse information showing in the one-line if possible. Sometimes in the field its impossible to see what the XF size is, or and what fuse is being used.
Thanks in advance!
So I will reach out to a utility company to get a site's short circuit information, and sometimes I receive the short circuit current values for the line side AND load side of the utility transformer. I also request X/R values and the utility transformer's KVA, Z%, V_LL, and upstream fuse. Then I plug the LINE side SC values and XF values into my SKM model and run short circuit. Typically the SKM calculated short circuit values on the secondary side of the transformer is much much higher than the values given to me by utility. Why is that?
I would think less about this if both values were similar, but typically they're very very different. For example 900A Vs. 3200A. Is it just a result of "real-life" losses vs. theoretical calculations? Is there another value I should request from the utility company to more accurately calculate the secondary values? Should I start adding a tolerance to Z% and adjusting the SC options to include the tolerance to get a closer secondary SC value? Is there an another solution to showing the utility values at the transformer secondary that I'm just missing completely? lol
I know I can lower Z% to adjust the values, but I don't really want to show a discrepancy between the model values and what the utility company gave me. I'm sure y'all know how enough discrepancies, even minor and with good reason, can make a customer raise an eyebrow. Plus I'm just curious.
I've seen other studies just remove the utility xf, and simply put the secondary SC values as the "utility". However, I think it's nice to have the utility xf and fuse information showing in the one-line if possible. Sometimes in the field its impossible to see what the XF size is, or and what fuse is being used.
Thanks in advance!