jesusrperezd
Member
- Location
- California
- Occupation
- Engineer
Hi all,
There is a 480-277V (3ph 4w) feeder from a wye solid grounded system. I am analysing the available faults on this circuit at 20%, 50%, and 100% of the circuit length.
For the Ground fault simulation, I have the option to add a "Fault impedance" in ohms to the calculation. I understand this value considers the impedance of the fault contact plus the return path to the source. It makes sense to consider a value to be realistic. The fault results vary significantly with impedance from 0 to 5 ohms.
A folk told me that he always uses 0.5 ohms, another one said he prefers to do it with 0 ohms to obtain the largest value.
I would like to have a consistent and logical method to analyse these cases. I believe this is crucial for coordinating protective devices and defining settings. My initial thought is to consider a value that represents the return through the EGCs, considering the sizes and length from the fault to the source.
What are your thoughts on this?
Thanks!
There is a 480-277V (3ph 4w) feeder from a wye solid grounded system. I am analysing the available faults on this circuit at 20%, 50%, and 100% of the circuit length.
For the Ground fault simulation, I have the option to add a "Fault impedance" in ohms to the calculation. I understand this value considers the impedance of the fault contact plus the return path to the source. It makes sense to consider a value to be realistic. The fault results vary significantly with impedance from 0 to 5 ohms.
A folk told me that he always uses 0.5 ohms, another one said he prefers to do it with 0 ohms to obtain the largest value.
I would like to have a consistent and logical method to analyse these cases. I believe this is crucial for coordinating protective devices and defining settings. My initial thought is to consider a value that represents the return through the EGCs, considering the sizes and length from the fault to the source.
What are your thoughts on this?
Thanks!