Sizing and protecting taps with power distribution blocks

Status
Not open for further replies.

sauceboss

Member
Location
US
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
Hey everyone! I'm designing a control cabinet for a conveyor system that contains some motor protector breakers powering VFDs in the field, 480vac-24vdc power supplies, 480vac-120vac transformer, etc. I'm still new at this in general but also this is the highest amperage panel my company has done so my coworkers do not really know either; we typically deal with <150A feeds but this one is 400A. We build to UL 508A standards and I'm looking for information about what NEC and UL say about it as I'm not sure we are applying to codes correctly. I've attached a little line drawing of an simplified setup but I've also explained the setup and thrown my questions below. It may not matter but the distance from the switch, thru the block, breakers, etc. to the loads or field terminals is less than 10 feet total.

On the side of our enclosure we mount a smaller box that has a fused disconnect switch in it and we'll run wires from the load side of the switch, thru a chase nipple/bushing, into the main enclosure, and then into the line terminals of a power distribution block. Due to the 400A nature, I'm actually wanting to split the load between (2) PDBs (doing 200A each) and to run (2) 000 wires from the switch, one to each PDB; 000 is just easier for our shop to deal with. My first question would be, is it even allowed to run 000 off of a 400 switch like this? I was using the 10' feeder tap rule to say that 000 could do over 10% of the upstream protection. But reading more perhaps this rule only applies when the wire terminates in a OCPD and not to a PDB. Again, we normally just do <150A panels and this feed would be a 0 size in that case which as far as I know there's no issues with.

Leaving the PDB, I've got smaller wires that go off to my various circuits. Some go to various individual breakers, others go to terminal blocks that then have several breakers going to those, and some feeder devices that jumper several breakers together (such as a 140M-C-WBE from AB). Most of these are 14 wire with a breaker directly on the other end. In our normal <150A panels, I assume the 10' rule applies as 14 can do 10% of 150A and it's protected on the other end for <15A. Do these wires now need to be sized to handle 20A (or maybe even 40A)? As I've said, I've also got some wires coming off the PDB that do not directly terminate in an OCPD but rather to terminal blocks or jumper terminal (which then eventually go to multiple breakers). Do these wires need to be sized for the 200A of the PDB (or maybe even the 400A)?

Is there anything that would make terminating to a terminal block, PDB, or the jumper feeder have different rules than say terminating to a terminal on a device?


I apologize if I'm breaking some major rules with this design. As I said, I'm new to panel designs and this size feed is new to my company. I'm looking to learn though and help or code references you all could provide would be great!

QN5pmfd.png
 
From your diagram what you have is a tap connected to a tap which is a violation. The single set of #3/0 to each power block needs to be changed to 2 sets to each power block.
 
From your diagram what you have is a tap connected to a tap which is a violation. The single set of #3/0 to each power block needs to be changed to 2 sets to each power block.
Alright, that way each supply to the PDB is rated for 400A and thus not a tap anymore. Makes sense.

With that change in mind, please let me know if the following is correct or a violation. Because the PDBs are considered to be 400A circuits, the three 14 gauge wires shown coming off the PDBs would need to be at least 8 gauge because then they would be considered taps. It seems like the new 8 gauge wire from the PDB to the terminal block would be a violation just like the PDB was before, so I would need to put a breaker between the PDB and terminal block that is sized at least 40A and then the 14 gauge leaving the terminal blocks would be considered taps and done correctly. Is all of that correct?
 
The tap conductors have to terminate at a single set of ocpd, not multiple ones.

I have found it is sometimes cost effective to use a mccb with distribution lugs instead of a power block.
 
Alright, that way each supply to the PDB is rated for 400A and thus not a tap anymore. Makes sense.

With that change in mind, please let me know if the following is correct or a violation. Because the PDBs are considered to be 400A circuits, the three 14 gauge wires shown coming off the PDBs would need to be at least 8 gauge because then they would be considered taps. It seems like the new 8 gauge wire from the PDB to the terminal block would be a violation just like the PDB was before, so I would need to put a breaker between the PDB and terminal block that is sized at least 40A and then the 14 gauge leaving the terminal blocks would be considered taps and done correctly. Is all of that correct?
You need to base the size of your tap conductors by the size of the feeder OCPD which is 400 amps. If using the 10' tap rule your tap conductors would need to have a minimum ampacity of 40 amps even for a 10 amp circuit. Also as Bob stated you need to have the tap conductors terminate in a single OCPD.
 
Is there a reason you are feeding this cabinet with 400 amps? It looks like the load is well under 100 amps based on CB's you have shown.

The tap rule becomes a lot more manageable with a 100 amp OCPD versus a 400 amp OCPD.
 
Is there a reason you are feeding this cabinet with 400 amps? It looks like the load is well under 100 amps based on CB's you have shown.

The tap rule becomes a lot more manageable with a 100 amp OCPD versus a 400 amp OCPD.
The image I showed was just a simplified example with more or less arbitrary values. The actual design is 400A and has one PDB with several #8 runs going to separate MPCBs each around 25-35 amps and I've got close to 190 amps on that block. The other block has several #6 runs going to three feeder blocks for comb busbars that jumper together several more MPCBs (like what is shown in the image, just with several jumpered sections) and also has runs supplying circuit breakers for transformer, power supplies, contactors for field supplies, and a run going to terminal blocks because my block ran out of holes and I've got around 150 amps on that block.

Like I said, we've not dealt with a feed this large before. It's just been 150 amps max and it seems like we've been mostly fine, other than with the #14 run that goes to terminal block; seems that needs to be protected.
 
The image I showed was just a simplified example with more or less arbitrary values. The actual design is 400A and has one PDB with several #8 runs going to separate MPCBs each around 25-35 amps and I've got close to 190 amps on that block. The other block has several #6 runs going to three feeder blocks for comb busbars that jumper together several more MPCBs (like what is shown in the image, just with several jumpered sections) and also has runs supplying circuit breakers for transformer, power supplies, contactors for field supplies, and a run going to terminal blocks because my block ran out of holes and I've got around 150 amps on that block.

Like I said, we've not dealt with a feed this large before. It's just been 150 amps max and it seems like we've been mostly fine, other than with the #14 run that goes to terminal block; seems that needs to be protected.
You seem to have a good plan, regardless of feeder size as long as the applicable tap rule is followed it should be code compliant.
 
Hey everyone! I'm designing a control cabinet for a conveyor system that contains some motor protector breakers powering VFDs in the field, 480vac-24vdc power supplies, 480vac-120vac transformer, etc. I'm still new at this in general but also this is the highest amperage panel my company has done so my coworkers do not really know either; we typically deal with <150A feeds but this one is 400A. We build to UL 508A standards and I'm looking for information about what NEC and UL say about it as I'm not sure we are applying to codes correctly. I've attached a little line drawing of an simplified setup but I've also explained the setup and thrown my questions below. It may not matter but the distance from the switch, thru the block, breakers, etc. to the loads or field terminals is less than 10 feet total.

On the side of our enclosure we mount a smaller box that has a fused disconnect switch in it and we'll run wires from the load side of the switch, thru a chase nipple/bushing, into the main enclosure, and then into the line terminals of a power distribution block. Due to the 400A nature, I'm actually wanting to split the load between (2) PDBs (doing 200A each) and to run (2) 000 wires from the switch, one to each PDB; 000 is just easier for our shop to deal with. My first question would be, is it even allowed to run 000 off of a 400 switch like this? I was using the 10' feeder tap rule to say that 000 could do over 10% of the upstream protection. But reading more perhaps this rule only applies when the wire terminates in a OCPD and not to a PDB. Again, we normally just do <150A panels and this feed would be a 0 size in that case which as far as I know there's no issues with.

Leaving the PDB, I've got smaller wires that go off to my various circuits. Some go to various individual breakers, others go to terminal blocks that then have several breakers going to those, and some feeder devices that jumper several breakers together (such as a 140M-C-WBE from AB). Most of these are 14 wire with a breaker directly on the other end. In our normal <150A panels, I assume the 10' rule applies as 14 can do 10% of 150A and it's protected on the other end for <15A. Do these wires now need to be sized to handle 20A (or maybe even 40A)? As I've said, I've also got some wires coming off the PDB that do not directly terminate in an OCPD but rather to terminal blocks or jumper terminal (which then eventually go to multiple breakers). Do these wires need to be sized for the 200A of the PDB (or maybe even the 400A)?

Is there anything that would make terminating to a terminal block, PDB, or the jumper feeder have different rules than say terminating to a terminal on a device?


I apologize if I'm breaking some major rules with this design. As I said, I'm new to panel designs and this size feed is new to my company. I'm looking to learn though and help or code references you all could provide would be great!

QN5pmfd.png
Even if you fixed the 400 amp feeder between the 400 amp main and the power blocks so they are 400 amp conductors, you still have "taps from taps" shown for the motor CBs jumpers on the far left and those three 2 amp CB's on the right are also tapped from a tap.

And yes you would need 8 AWG to each circuit breaker because of the 10% in the 10' tap rule.

This is all based on NEC. I don't know 508 standards, you may be able to do some things NEC will not let you do.
 
Hmm. I've been reading through UL 508A standard more closely and I really only see one mention about a taps and it's in section "31.4 Sizing of branch circuit protection for motor groups" which seems to be "a group of loads, consisting of two or more motors, or one or more motors and other loads." I don't think that applies here since I don't have multiple loads behind a branch OCPD.

I don't see anything about feeder taps which is what all of the taps off the PDB are, correct? I know this is more of an NEC site but does someone have a UL 508A code reference regarding this?
 
31.4.3 “The internal conductor to individual Loads”

We understand this as the conductors rated amps from the point of the tap to the Group Load cannot be not be less than 1/3 of the branch circuit conductors rated in amps (This is Panel FLA). Keep in mind conductor may be sized smaller than the main breaker that feeds them for conductors are sized to loads then the next size breaker is used. When using motor groups use the listed jumper bars with the Listed feeder terminal.

Now if the conductors feeding a single load connected to Load side of an OCP that has no additional BCP and are “Suitable as Tap Protector” then you may use the 1/10 instead of the 1/3.

We by defat size all wiring to the breaker ratting over actual FLA, but I see the big guys usually do not. We then use the 1/3 rule to distribution points the 1/10 rule to
 
A potential issue you may not be dressing is SCCP you said "terminal" you may need to add "J" fuses to acquire decent SCCP..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top