Alwayslearningelec
Senior Member
- Location
- NJ
- Occupation
- Estimator
When sizing wire/feeder from breaker to to a panel the wire should be sized to the breaker feeding the panel and not the panel ratings, correct?
Yes, which wouldn't be smart. So obviously feeder ampacity should be according to breaker size,Short example.. it is permissible to feed a 400 amp panel with a 100 amp feeder conductor fed from a 100 amp breaker.
Does that clarify it for you ?
UnderstoodYou've been hanging out with "sting"
If that's the specs on your "load" side panel, a 175 amp MCB would require a minimum of 2/0cu but the actual size conductor required could well be determined by the "supply" OCP, tap rules, etc,
You need to present the full picture ie: what protectes the feeder at it's origin, etc.
No, that's fine. The panel is protected by the 150A MCB.1. 400a bus duct switch with 350A fuses feeding a panel with bus rating of 225A and MCB rated at 150A
So the protection(bus duct switch/fuses) is above the panel rating which is incorrect??
The feeder must be protected by the 350A fuses, so 400mcm minimum...unless the feeder length is short enough to comply with one of the tap rules in 240.21(B), then #1/0 minimum.No feeder size info was given but as mentioned in post above the panel and conductors must be protected at or below their ratings which they are not.
Thanks. So you says MUST. You mean IS, correct?No, that's fine. The panel is protected by the 150A MCB.
The feeder must be protected by the 350A fuses, so 400mcm minimum...unless the feeder length is short enough to comply with one of the tap rules in 240.21(B), then #1/0 minimum.
This is a silly design. Just install 225 amp fuses and conductors and use a MLO panel.Understood
So here's two scenario:
1. 400a bus duct switch with 350A fuses feeding a panel with bus rating of 225A and MCB rated at 150A
So the protection(bus duct switch/fuses) is above the panel rating which is incorrect?? No feeder size info was given but as mentioned in post above the panel and conductors must be protected at or below their ratings which they are not.
I mean "must be"...Thanks. So you says MUST. You mean IS, correct?
I don't see MLO panels often, mostly MCB. Must be a design reason MCB are used most often.This is a silly design. Just install 225 amp fuses and conductors and use a MLO panel.
It often depends on where the OCPD for the feeder is located. If it's in the same room as the panel the MCB is a waste of money.I don't see MLO panels often, mostly MCB. Must be a design reason MCB are used most often.
Why?It often depends on where the OCPD for the feeder is located. If it's in the same room as the panel the MCB is a waste of money.
If the feeder originates on another floor or a long distance from the panel we typically see that panels with main circuit breakers so that it can be shut down locally. If the feeder originates right next to the panel the main CB isn't really needed.Why?
Sometimes a MB may be required for series ratings. The breaker doesn't have to specifically be located in the panel , but due to a variety of factors, such as different manufacturers, use of feeder fuses that don't series rate, or taking advantage of the conductor impedance, a MB panel board may be the best option.I don't see MLO panels often, mostly MCB. Must be a design reason MCB are used most often.
So wire ampacity has be equal to or greater than the OCPD protecting the wire?No, that's fine. The panel is protected by the 150A MCB.
The feeder must be protected by the 350A fuses, so 400mcm minimum...unless the feeder length is short enough to comply with one of the tap rules in 240.21(B), then #1/0 minimum.
See NEC 240.4.So wire ampacity has be equal to or greater than the OCPD protecting the wire?
Will do, thanks.See NEC 240.4.