I'm looking for some clarification on a motor. A customer is having a problem with a vacuum pump. The pump is occasionally started without first relieving the vacuum in the chamber, so it's being started under load. This causes the breaker to trip. It is a 2hp motor supplied by a 1 pole 20 amp breaker, type BL, HACR. It is connected to a 20 amp twist-lock receptacle by a length of 14-3 SOW. The nameplate FLA is 18.4, so we've got a bit of a problem.
Using 24 amps FLA (Table 430.248) and multiplying by 125% (430.22A), I need conductors rated for 30 amps, but I can protect them with a 60 amp breaker (Table 430.52).
Here's what I'm unsure about:
I'm planning on replacing the 20 amp receptacle and attachment plug. When the wire size does not correspond with the breaker size do I size the devices according to the conductor size or breaker size? I think I need 30 amp devices. Likewise, I think I need to replace the 14-3 SOW with #10, but that seems like overkill. Do I size this cable according to the nameplate, Table 430.248, or the 30 amp attachment plug?
Can I use the 90 degree column in T310.16 and re-use the existing #12 THHN? (I think the answer to this one is "No")
Am I correct in using the "Inverse Time Breaker" column in T430.52 when considering the ITE type BL breaker?
I think I've got this mostly figured out, but I'd like someone to doublecheck me and set me straight if need be. Thanks.
Using 24 amps FLA (Table 430.248) and multiplying by 125% (430.22A), I need conductors rated for 30 amps, but I can protect them with a 60 amp breaker (Table 430.52).
Here's what I'm unsure about:
I'm planning on replacing the 20 amp receptacle and attachment plug. When the wire size does not correspond with the breaker size do I size the devices according to the conductor size or breaker size? I think I need 30 amp devices. Likewise, I think I need to replace the 14-3 SOW with #10, but that seems like overkill. Do I size this cable according to the nameplate, Table 430.248, or the 30 amp attachment plug?
Can I use the 90 degree column in T310.16 and re-use the existing #12 THHN? (I think the answer to this one is "No")
Am I correct in using the "Inverse Time Breaker" column in T430.52 when considering the ITE type BL breaker?
I think I've got this mostly figured out, but I'd like someone to doublecheck me and set me straight if need be. Thanks.