Spare capacity in panelboards

Status
Not open for further replies.

sadegh

Member
Does NEC require "spare" capacity in panelboards?
I believe it is a good design practice, not a CODE issue, but an electrical inspector claims it is code requirement, I can not find it anywhere in code.
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

NEC'05
Article 90
90.8 Wiring Planning.
(A)Future Expansion and Convenience.
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

I don't see how 90.8(A) is a requirement to provide spare room in a panelboard.
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

The answer is that the NEC does not require spare capacity, and that any Inspector that fails a project on that basis is exceeding his or her authority. I say that knowing that there is always the possibility that local codes may be more restrictive, and that a local code may require, for example, spare capacity. However, the original question states that the Inspector is claiming this to be a code requirement. So to be clear, it is not a National Electrical Code Requirement.

Please note that 90.8 speaks about the virtues of spare capacity, but does not require it.
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

Gentlemen,
Where you see or agree,is up to yourself.Like I said before,I have been attending Inspector Classes.I have no knowledge of where this poster is located,or even if we reside in same area.I suspect we do not.

This is how this article section was explaind to me in Inspector classes,which I assume is same being called upond.

Interpret,as you will.

I didn't write it..
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

Dillon,

It may be that it's a local requirement where you are to provide additional spaces for future expansion in a panelboard, but as Charlie pointed out it's not an NEC requirement.
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

Infinity,Brother..

Like I said,this IS the article/section that this poster's Inspector, is refering too...

I can't tell you, what part of the country this poster is working in...Can elaborate, where I am..

Local,could be..But this is the way it was explained in my classes....Wasn't explained or defined, as being a local requirement though Infinity..

edited for spelling..

[ May 23, 2005, 11:37 AM: Message edited by: dillon3c ]
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

From the NFPA NEC Handbook (bolding is mine):

"Electrical and communications distribution centers should contain additional space and capacity for future additions and should be conveniently located for easy accessibility.

Where electrical and communications distribution equipment is installed so that easy access cannot be achieved, a spare raceway(s) or pull line(s) should be run at the initial installation, as illustrated in Exhibit 90.2."

I agree that spare capacity should be provided but the NEC doesn't require the additional capacity. :D
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

Gentlemen,
Again I didn't write it,and I'm not defending it.But this is exactly what was explained to me.
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

dillon3c,
Again I didn't write it,and I'm not defending it.But this is exactly what was explained to me.
That doesn't mean that the explanation is correct.
90.8 Wiring Planning.
(A) Future Expansion and Convenience. Plans and specifications that provide ample space in raceways, spare raceways, and additional spaces allow for future increases in the use of electricity. Distribution centers located in readily accessible locations provide convenience and safety of operation.
There is no mandatory or enforceable language in 90.8. The section only makes a statement, it does not command any action.
Don
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

dillon3c If 90.8 required extra capacity it would have to specify how much capacity is enough.

Reading it the way you have been taught means it is an open ended requirement. The EC would have to provide as much extra capacity as the inspector wanted that day.
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

Originally posted by sadegh:
I can not find it anywhere in code.
I getting a little bewildered on this issue. Get a interpretation from NFPA if you choose.And in all due respect to Chief Moderator,your interpretation doesn't make it so either sir.

Man asked for code section, he got one proving that it's in the book( he could not locate).Code officials depending of area,can certainly interpret,and use "at will" as seeing fit in situation.His Inspector must recognize it, seems don. And me discussing the issue in forum,probably will not change that fact.Do you think it will change it don?

Don,if it doesn't apply, nor inforced to your area,cool beans man..

I did give accurate description, of the classroom interpretation.Again,I'm not defending ruling from N.Carolina/Inspector in class,and also not saying that I agree with it either.I just mearly pointed out,where it is in book..

We all together on this now,I am not the original posters Inspector.

dillon3c
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

I would imagine that a panel that will accept tandem breakers qualifies as meeting the need for "Future Expansion and Convenience". (I'm counting on it for a service inspection tomorrow; the panel is full.)
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

Dillion if you read 90.5 it clearly states what is enforceable and what is not. 90.8 does not have enforceable language as to what 90.5 states.

A) Mandatory Rules. Mandatory rules of this Code are those that identify actions that are specifically required or prohibited and are characterized by the use of the terms shall or shall not.
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

good night all, (picking my toys up)"you want to argue with me about it,and I take no stance on this subject".I've got no control over what in that book.You do see it in the though book... right..
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

Yes we see it in the NEC but 90.5 guide us as to when and how it can be enforced. I'm not saying that it's not in the book but as per 90.5 it's informational only. It should have been an FPN.
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

fellas,
I'm not getting short with you.I'll give you the background of the conversation about this article in class...here it come,I type slow..

[ May 23, 2005, 07:46 PM: Message edited by: dillon3c ]
 
Re: Spare capacity in panelboards

Man asked for code section, he got one proving that it's in the book( he could not locate).
What he asked for and what you provided are not the same thing. 90.8(A) does not require spare spaces in a panelboard. Sounds like the instructor in you inspectors class made an error.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top