pkelectrical
Member
- Location
- NJ
Here is the setup
300A generac disconnect service rated feed by 350 mcm ALU
1. (2) 200A subpanels in the basement & 200A fusible disconnect with 110A fuses for Steam unit
Running 250 mcm copper from the 300A disconnect and using 3/0 copper taps for the sub panels and 1/0 Alu tap for the Steam disconnect
Table 250.102(C)1 calls for #2 copper bonding. The 300A Generac has 1/0 Copper bonding jumper
Q1. Why does the 300A generac has 1/0 bonding jumper? Is it oversized or I need to run 1/0 bonding to the subpanels/trough/disconnect etc as well?
Q2. I noticed 3/0 SER Copper (not being used in this installation) has 1/0 ground as well. Is there a reason why they make it with 1/0 where smaller size would be sufficient?
Q3. Can I run for example 1/0 Bonding jumper from the 300A ATS and bond the trough and then run all my other bonding to it? Or I have to run the back to the ATS? (what I would normally do, but that is 50' run)
In my opinion if I ran 1/0 Copper bonding from the ATS to the trough and run the other bonding to it, it would be a better system then running #2 Copper bonding jumper from the ATS and then loop bond all the equipment
What are your thoughts?
300A generac disconnect service rated feed by 350 mcm ALU
1. (2) 200A subpanels in the basement & 200A fusible disconnect with 110A fuses for Steam unit
Running 250 mcm copper from the 300A disconnect and using 3/0 copper taps for the sub panels and 1/0 Alu tap for the Steam disconnect
Table 250.102(C)1 calls for #2 copper bonding. The 300A Generac has 1/0 Copper bonding jumper
Q1. Why does the 300A generac has 1/0 bonding jumper? Is it oversized or I need to run 1/0 bonding to the subpanels/trough/disconnect etc as well?
Q2. I noticed 3/0 SER Copper (not being used in this installation) has 1/0 ground as well. Is there a reason why they make it with 1/0 where smaller size would be sufficient?
Q3. Can I run for example 1/0 Bonding jumper from the 300A ATS and bond the trough and then run all my other bonding to it? Or I have to run the back to the ATS? (what I would normally do, but that is 50' run)
In my opinion if I ran 1/0 Copper bonding from the ATS to the trough and run the other bonding to it, it would be a better system then running #2 Copper bonding jumper from the ATS and then loop bond all the equipment
What are your thoughts?