Originally posted by jro:
Ryan, no heat from here, but I have to ask was this installation inspected?
Notice in my post that ...I ALLOWED...
[ September 19, 2003, 08:36 PM: Message edited by: ryan_618 ]
The ground has to be contiuous. It can be tapped, but it has to be continuous.Originally posted by c094728:
I was told <snip> It has to be one continuous wire. <snip>
And how exactly would I be permitted to fail this installation? As an inspector, I am limited to enforcing the provisions of the NEC, whether I like the installation or not. The fact of the matter is...it is pressure and it is irreversible. I get tired of hearing about inspectors enforcing more than the code, but yet when I allow something that meets the code I still hear about it. Now...why should the gods of electricity be angry?Originally posted by jro:
Ryan if you were a US Marine it would be ok, a Marine will always adapt to the situation, but if you are not, then may the gods of electricity bring shame upon you.
From a former USAF Nuclear Weapons Specialist: No, but it was approved by the AHJ. Repeat after me . . .Originally posted by Bennie:
From a former Marine; Is a set screw connector considered to be a compression connector?
I was building a house once and we drilled an extra pier hole for the foundation. The inspector asked why we drilled the extra hole. We said it couldn't hurt to drill an extra hole. He said we needed to re-engineer the foundation. We attempted to negotiate, but he held firm. We quickly filled in the hold before he left and he signed off on the inspection. He never asked us to fill in the hole. We came up with our own solution. Nobody got hurt.Originally posted by roger:
Where in the NEC did we take away the inspectors common sense, knowledge, experience, and education to deem an installation safe.<snip>
I like your attitude.Originally posted by charlie:
Everyone repeat after me, "The inspector is always correct."