- Location
- Lockport, IL
- Occupation
- Semi-Retired Electrical Engineer
I received a submittal from the EC on the topic of medium voltage cables. The specs call for a 1/3 concentric neutral; the EC submitted full concentric neutral. The specs call for type URD. The EC submitted UD. On the surface, it would seem we are getting more than we asked for, and that should make the owner happy. But this owner has been hard to get along with, and I want to make sure. Here are some things I don't know about these terms:
TIA.
- What is the purpose of a concentric neutral?
- Since each ungrounded, single conductor has a concentric neutral, what do we do with the concentric neutral wires (i.e., do we find a way to ultimately connect them all to the neutral bus)?
- If each of the A, B, and C has one of these things, and if we do connect them to the neutral bar, then does that mean we don't need to run a separate neutral wire (this I tend to doubt)?
- Other than the obvious "more is better," what would make a full concentric better (or perhaps not as effective as) a 1/3 concentric neutral?
- I don't know why the specs would have called for URD on a office building project, given that the "R" is residential, would use of UD be better?
- Was it likely an error on the part of the spec writer to have called for URD instead of UD?
TIA.