S Simon2015 Member Location Fremont Jul 29, 2015 #1 There is a NEC code related or that state that THE BREAKER THAT FEEDS a subpanel without main breaker HAS TO BE LOCKABLE.
There is a NEC code related or that state that THE BREAKER THAT FEEDS a subpanel without main breaker HAS TO BE LOCKABLE.
Sierrasparky Senior Member Location USA Occupation Electrician ,contractor Jul 29, 2015 #3 no, not that i am aware of. I suppose one can interpret the code that way.
kwired Electron manager Location NE Nebraska Occupation EC Jul 29, 2015 #4 Not a NEC requirement. Not a bad design either, especially in cases where strict LOTO practices are applied.
Not a NEC requirement. Not a bad design either, especially in cases where strict LOTO practices are applied.
T templdl Senior Member Location Wisconsin Jul 29, 2015 #5 Not required but it may be a good idea though.
petersonra Senior Member Location Northern illinois Occupation engineer Jul 30, 2015 #6 Simon2015 said: There is a NEC code related or that state that THE BREAKER THAT FEEDS a subpanel without main breaker HAS TO BE LOCKABLE. Click to expand... there might be some cases where this is true for other reasons, but not as a general NEC rule.
Simon2015 said: There is a NEC code related or that state that THE BREAKER THAT FEEDS a subpanel without main breaker HAS TO BE LOCKABLE. Click to expand... there might be some cases where this is true for other reasons, but not as a general NEC rule.